The comparison between LR and NN methods for quality assurance prediction of bearing machining

Kang-Hsien Tu, Chun-Chieh Wang, J. Ho, Hui-Chun Tseng
{"title":"The comparison between LR and NN methods for quality assurance prediction of bearing machining","authors":"Kang-Hsien Tu, Chun-Chieh Wang, J. Ho, Hui-Chun Tseng","doi":"10.1109/ISNE.2016.7543399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state of a cutting tool is an important factor in bearing cutting process. Several methods developed for monitoring cutting tool and observing the bearing ring quality while prediction error has been attempted. This paper presents logistic regression (LR) and neural network (NN) methods that have been employed in tool life monitoring. We input 88 data total into two models, and resulted in errors of 6.30% and 3.16%, respectively. The results showed that NN is well-suited to the cutting tool condition, obviously which NN method is better than that of logistic regression. Thus, it can be concluded that NN is quite encouraging for future applications in the prediction of bearing cutting area.","PeriodicalId":127324,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics (ISNE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics (ISNE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISNE.2016.7543399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The state of a cutting tool is an important factor in bearing cutting process. Several methods developed for monitoring cutting tool and observing the bearing ring quality while prediction error has been attempted. This paper presents logistic regression (LR) and neural network (NN) methods that have been employed in tool life monitoring. We input 88 data total into two models, and resulted in errors of 6.30% and 3.16%, respectively. The results showed that NN is well-suited to the cutting tool condition, obviously which NN method is better than that of logistic regression. Thus, it can be concluded that NN is quite encouraging for future applications in the prediction of bearing cutting area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轴承加工质量保证预测的LR和NN方法比较
刀具的状态是轴承切削过程中的一个重要因素。提出了几种在预测误差情况下监测刀具和观察轴承套圈质量的方法。本文介绍了逻辑回归(LR)和神经网络(NN)方法在刀具寿命监测中的应用。我们在两个模型中共输入88个数据,误差分别为6.30%和3.16%。结果表明,神经网络能很好地适应刀具工况,明显优于逻辑回归方法。因此,可以得出结论,神经网络在轴承切割面积预测中的未来应用是非常令人鼓舞的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cover letter Identification system testing and optimisation Design of a LVDS RX soft IP kernel for multichannel ultrasound imaging systems The comparison between LR and NN methods for quality assurance prediction of bearing machining Preparation and characterization of surface treatment on single-walled carbon nanotubes thin films by 4-azidoaniline hydrochloride
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1