{"title":"The Decadent Imagination","authors":"L. Eastlake","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198833031.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how aesthetes and decadents staked a competing claim to those Roman narratives of corruption and contagion outlined in Chapter 7. Beginning with a detailed analysis of Marius the Epicurean (1885), it shows how Walter Pater and his contemporaries sought to delink aestheticism from Gibbonian narratives of decline and fall, and to reclaim aesthetic masculinity from associations of moral and masculine deviance. The second part examines decadent authors such as Oscar Wilde, Villiers de L’Isle Adam, and George Moore, who adopted an equally recuperative, though more controversial approach to the ancient Roman past. Revelling in the more illicit and disturbing aspects of Roman history with a playfully self-parodic humour which is typical of the movement as a whole, and frequently voicing their affinity with the most notorious of Roman emperors—Nero—decadent writers appear be invested in a very genuine attempt to disassociate decadent ideologies from Gibbonian models of degeneration and decline.","PeriodicalId":173234,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Rome and Victorian Masculinity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Rome and Victorian Masculinity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198833031.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter examines how aesthetes and decadents staked a competing claim to those Roman narratives of corruption and contagion outlined in Chapter 7. Beginning with a detailed analysis of Marius the Epicurean (1885), it shows how Walter Pater and his contemporaries sought to delink aestheticism from Gibbonian narratives of decline and fall, and to reclaim aesthetic masculinity from associations of moral and masculine deviance. The second part examines decadent authors such as Oscar Wilde, Villiers de L’Isle Adam, and George Moore, who adopted an equally recuperative, though more controversial approach to the ancient Roman past. Revelling in the more illicit and disturbing aspects of Roman history with a playfully self-parodic humour which is typical of the movement as a whole, and frequently voicing their affinity with the most notorious of Roman emperors—Nero—decadent writers appear be invested in a very genuine attempt to disassociate decadent ideologies from Gibbonian models of degeneration and decline.
本章考察了美学家和颓废主义者是如何对第7章中概述的罗马人对腐败和传染病的叙述提出竞争主张的。从对伊壁鸠鲁派《马吕斯》(Marius the Epicurean, 1885)的详细分析开始,它展示了沃尔特·佩特(Walter Pater)和他的同时代人如何试图将唯美主义与吉本式的衰落叙事分离开来,并从道德和男性越轨行为的联想中重新获得审美的男性气质。第二部分考察了颓废的作家,如奥斯卡·王尔德、维里埃斯·德·莱尔·亚当和乔治·摩尔,他们对古罗马的过去采取了同样的恢复,尽管更具争议性的方法。沉迷于罗马历史中更不正当和令人不安的方面,以一种诙谐的自我模仿的幽默,这是整个运动的典型特征,并且经常表达他们与最臭名昭著的罗马皇帝的亲近感——尼禄颓废派作家似乎投入了一种非常真诚的尝试,将颓废的意识形态与吉本尼的堕落和衰落模式分离开来。