Gender in Martin Buber’s Hasidic Tales

S. S. Shonkoff
{"title":"Gender in Martin Buber’s Hasidic Tales","authors":"S. S. Shonkoff","doi":"10.1093/leobaeck/ybad004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Martin Buber’s anthologies of Hasidic tales remain some of his most widely read writings, but few have studied them intertextually vis-à-vis the original Hasidic sources. This article does so, focusing specifically on Buber’s representations of gender in Hasidism. Reading Buber’s tales hermeneutically for gender sheds light on Buber, Hasidism, and the dynamic confluence between them. Firstly, it helps us to identify key aspects of Buber’s representation of Hasidic theology. Regardless of his intentions, when Buber remoulded Hasidic sources to prioritize bodily concreteness over spiritual abstraction, meetings over meditations, and tales over treatises, he subverted theological-metaphysical constructions of gender in Hasidism. Secondly, reading the tales for gender illuminates key aspects of Buber’s representation of Hasidic communities. Buber often softened and omitted sexist elements in the original sources. While this may reveal his egalitarian impulses at times, the article demonstrates that Buber’s efforts to hide misogyny actually rendered women even less visible than they were in the original sources, as images of women dissolved into a sort of gender-blind, neutral (i.e. masculine) humanism. As a whole, Buber’s textual alterations raise thorny questions regarding the ethics of neo-Hasidism or any other movements that gloss over the shadows of historical phenomena.","PeriodicalId":391272,"journal":{"name":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/ybad004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Martin Buber’s anthologies of Hasidic tales remain some of his most widely read writings, but few have studied them intertextually vis-à-vis the original Hasidic sources. This article does so, focusing specifically on Buber’s representations of gender in Hasidism. Reading Buber’s tales hermeneutically for gender sheds light on Buber, Hasidism, and the dynamic confluence between them. Firstly, it helps us to identify key aspects of Buber’s representation of Hasidic theology. Regardless of his intentions, when Buber remoulded Hasidic sources to prioritize bodily concreteness over spiritual abstraction, meetings over meditations, and tales over treatises, he subverted theological-metaphysical constructions of gender in Hasidism. Secondly, reading the tales for gender illuminates key aspects of Buber’s representation of Hasidic communities. Buber often softened and omitted sexist elements in the original sources. While this may reveal his egalitarian impulses at times, the article demonstrates that Buber’s efforts to hide misogyny actually rendered women even less visible than they were in the original sources, as images of women dissolved into a sort of gender-blind, neutral (i.e. masculine) humanism. As a whole, Buber’s textual alterations raise thorny questions regarding the ethics of neo-Hasidism or any other movements that gloss over the shadows of historical phenomena.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马丁·布伯的《哈西德派故事》中的性别
马丁·布伯的哈西德派故事选集仍然是他最广泛阅读的作品之一,但很少有人在-à-vis原始哈西德派资料中研究它们。这篇文章就是这样做的,特别关注布伯在哈西德主义中对性别的表现。从性别的角度解读布伯的故事,有助于了解布伯、哈西德主义,以及它们之间的动态融合。首先,它帮助我们识别布伯对哈西德派神学的表现的关键方面。不管他的意图是什么,当布伯重塑哈西德派的资料,将身体的具体性优先于精神的抽象,将会议优先于冥想,将故事优先于论文时,他颠覆了哈西德派对性别的神学形而上学建构。其次,从性别角度解读这些故事揭示了布伯代表哈西德派社区的关键方面。布伯经常软化和省略原始资料中的性别歧视因素。虽然这有时可能揭示了他的平等主义冲动,但这篇文章表明,布伯隐藏厌女症的努力实际上使女性比原始资料中更不引人注目,因为女性的形象溶解在一种性别盲目的、中性的(即男性化的)人文主义中。作为一个整体,Buber的文本修改提出了关于新哈西德主义或任何其他掩盖历史现象阴影的运动的伦理的棘手问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating Liminality: Jewish Refugees in Global Transit Melzer and the Dead Sea Scrolls: Anna Seghers’s GDR novel Die Entscheidung (1959) ‘I think he will be able to adjust’. Letters of Recommendation Accompanying Jewish Refugees in Transit during National Socialism Index to Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 2023 1939 Emigrantensong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1