Are advanced DfT structures sufficient for preventing scan-attacks?

Jean DaRolt, G. D. Natale, M. Flottes, B. Rouzeyre
{"title":"Are advanced DfT structures sufficient for preventing scan-attacks?","authors":"Jean DaRolt, G. D. Natale, M. Flottes, B. Rouzeyre","doi":"10.1109/VTS.2012.6231061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard Design for Testability (DfT) structures are well known as potential sources of confidential information leakage. Scan-based attacks have been reported in publications since the early 2000s. It has been shown for instance that the secret key for symmetric encryption standards (DES, AES) could be retrieved from information gathered on scan-out pins when scan-chains are fully observed through these pins. However DfT practices have progressed to adapt to large and complex designs such as test response compaction, associated X-masking structure, partial scan, etc. As a side effect, these techniques mask part of the information collected on scan outputs. Thus, at first glance, they may appear as countermeasures against scan-based attacks. Nevertheless, in this paper we show that DfT structures, regardless of their nature, do not inherently enhance security and that specific additional countermeasures are still needed. We propose a new-scan attack able to deal with designs where only part of the internal circuit's state is observed for test purpose.","PeriodicalId":169611,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 30th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 30th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VTS.2012.6231061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Standard Design for Testability (DfT) structures are well known as potential sources of confidential information leakage. Scan-based attacks have been reported in publications since the early 2000s. It has been shown for instance that the secret key for symmetric encryption standards (DES, AES) could be retrieved from information gathered on scan-out pins when scan-chains are fully observed through these pins. However DfT practices have progressed to adapt to large and complex designs such as test response compaction, associated X-masking structure, partial scan, etc. As a side effect, these techniques mask part of the information collected on scan outputs. Thus, at first glance, they may appear as countermeasures against scan-based attacks. Nevertheless, in this paper we show that DfT structures, regardless of their nature, do not inherently enhance security and that specific additional countermeasures are still needed. We propose a new-scan attack able to deal with designs where only part of the internal circuit's state is observed for test purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级DfT结构是否足以防止扫描攻击?
众所周知,可测试性标准设计(DfT)结构是机密信息泄露的潜在来源。自21世纪初以来,基于扫描的攻击一直在出版物中报道。例如,当扫描链通过这些引脚被完全观察到时,可以从扫描出引脚上收集的信息中检索对称加密标准(DES, AES)的秘密密钥。然而,DfT实践已经发展到适应大型和复杂的设计,如测试响应压缩,相关的x屏蔽结构,部分扫描等。作为副作用,这些技术掩盖了扫描输出中收集的部分信息。因此,乍一看,它们可能是针对基于扫描的攻击的对策。然而,在本文中,我们证明了DfT结构,无论其性质如何,都不会固有地增强安全性,并且仍然需要特定的附加对策。我们提出了一种新的扫描攻击,能够处理仅为测试目的而观察部分内部电路状态的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Derating based hardware optimizations in soft error tolerant designs Exploiting X-correlation in output compression via superset X-canceling SAT-ATPG using preferences for improved detection of complex defect mechanisms Smart selection of indirect parameters for DC-based alternate RF IC testing Write-through method for embedded memory with compression Scan-based testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1