{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"T. Gonzales","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the conclusion the author considers the value of trust and suggests new ways to engage residents and improve resident-led inclusion at all levels of redevelopment: research, planning, implementation, and assessment of results. The conclusion begins with a discussion of the Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s model of “comprehensive community development.” Despite the feel-good nature embedded in ideas of trust, evidence suggests that the corporation’s approach may actually continue a history of socially unjust urban development, with its documented inequities. The conclusion explains how collective skepticism can be used by marginalized populations to network and yield more equitable results.","PeriodicalId":431728,"journal":{"name":"Building a Better Chicago","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building a Better Chicago","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the conclusion the author considers the value of trust and suggests new ways to engage residents and improve resident-led inclusion at all levels of redevelopment: research, planning, implementation, and assessment of results. The conclusion begins with a discussion of the Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s model of “comprehensive community development.” Despite the feel-good nature embedded in ideas of trust, evidence suggests that the corporation’s approach may actually continue a history of socially unjust urban development, with its documented inequities. The conclusion explains how collective skepticism can be used by marginalized populations to network and yield more equitable results.