Conclusion

T. Gonzales
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"T. Gonzales","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the conclusion the author considers the value of trust and suggests new ways to engage residents and improve resident-led inclusion at all levels of redevelopment: research, planning, implementation, and assessment of results. The conclusion begins with a discussion of the Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s model of “comprehensive community development.” Despite the feel-good nature embedded in ideas of trust, evidence suggests that the corporation’s approach may actually continue a history of socially unjust urban development, with its documented inequities. The conclusion explains how collective skepticism can be used by marginalized populations to network and yield more equitable results.","PeriodicalId":431728,"journal":{"name":"Building a Better Chicago","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building a Better Chicago","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479839759.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the conclusion the author considers the value of trust and suggests new ways to engage residents and improve resident-led inclusion at all levels of redevelopment: research, planning, implementation, and assessment of results. The conclusion begins with a discussion of the Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s model of “comprehensive community development.” Despite the feel-good nature embedded in ideas of trust, evidence suggests that the corporation’s approach may actually continue a history of socially unjust urban development, with its documented inequities. The conclusion explains how collective skepticism can be used by marginalized populations to network and yield more equitable results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结论
在结论中,作者考虑了信任的价值,并提出了在重建的各个层面上吸引居民和改善居民主导的包容的新方法:研究、规划、实施和结果评估。结语部分首先讨论了地方倡议支持公司的“社区综合发展”模式。尽管信任的理念中蕴含着自我感觉良好的本质,但有证据表明,该公司的做法实际上可能延续了社会不公正的城市发展历史,并记录了不平等现象。结论解释了边缘化人群如何利用集体怀疑来建立网络并产生更公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Seat at the Table “Teamwork to Make the Dream Work” Conclusion “You Can’t Do It if You’re Mad, You Can Do It if You’re Organized”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1