Rethinking the dominant modernist planning narrative: Investigating pedestrianisation in Europe, 1960s–1970s

Cédric Feriel
{"title":"Rethinking the dominant modernist planning narrative: Investigating pedestrianisation in Europe, 1960s–1970s","authors":"Cédric Feriel","doi":"10.1177/00225266231188606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to discuss the 1970s as a breaking point in both urban and transport history. The dominant narrative of urban planning sets two periods after 1945 in opposition: the post-war modernist and car-oriented city on the one hand, and on the other hand the (more) sustainable and pedestrian-oriented city that supposedly started to arise in the 1980s. This time frame reveals the importance given to the narrative of the avant-garde, the great intellectual figures, and the national policies in urban history. The paper decentres the investigation into the history of pedestrianisation in Europe and highlights how “anonymous” city engineers and local urban planners produced alternative pathways to modernisation as early as the 1950s. The European municipal movement for pedestrianisation appears as the missing link between the radical functionalist approach of post-war modern planning, and the present trend in favour of public space and walkability.","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266231188606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article intends to discuss the 1970s as a breaking point in both urban and transport history. The dominant narrative of urban planning sets two periods after 1945 in opposition: the post-war modernist and car-oriented city on the one hand, and on the other hand the (more) sustainable and pedestrian-oriented city that supposedly started to arise in the 1980s. This time frame reveals the importance given to the narrative of the avant-garde, the great intellectual figures, and the national policies in urban history. The paper decentres the investigation into the history of pedestrianisation in Europe and highlights how “anonymous” city engineers and local urban planners produced alternative pathways to modernisation as early as the 1950s. The European municipal movement for pedestrianisation appears as the missing link between the radical functionalist approach of post-war modern planning, and the present trend in favour of public space and walkability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考占主导地位的现代主义规划叙事:调查20世纪60年代至70年代欧洲的行人专用区
这篇文章打算把20世纪70年代作为城市和交通历史的转折点来讨论。1945年之后,城市规划的主流叙事设定了两个对立的时期:一方面是战后现代主义和以汽车为导向的城市,另一方面是(更)可持续和以行人为导向的城市,据说是从20世纪80年代开始出现的。这个时间框架揭示了城市历史中先锋派叙事、伟大的知识分子人物和国家政策的重要性。这篇论文将调查的重点放在了欧洲行人专用区的历史上,并强调了早在20世纪50年代,“匿名”的城市工程师和当地城市规划者是如何创造出现代化的替代途径的。欧洲的城市步行运动似乎是战后现代规划的激进功能主义方法与当前有利于公共空间和步行性的趋势之间缺失的一环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working around exclusive infrastructure – African workers and their families navigating race and gender on Rhodesia Railways, 1945–1964 Skotovoz, pripiski and the “law of labour settlement”: Transportation planning and management in the USSR Corrigendum to “The road corvée: The persistence of the use of unpaid labour for road maintenance in nineteenth and twentieth century Estonia” Transport history: a niche moving toward the mainstream? Book Review: Motion in Maps. Maps in Motion. Mapping Stories and Movement through Time by Zef Segal and Bram Vannieuwenhuyze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1