Book Review: Cycling and the British: A Modern History by Neil Carter

P. Cox
{"title":"Book Review: Cycling and the British: A Modern History by Neil Carter","authors":"P. Cox","doi":"10.1177/00225266211068993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"more comparative perspective is needed here since not only London but Paris were cities with large and iconic metro systems which modified daily urban experience and built new subjects. In fact, this book offers a well and solid theoretical frame to do this comparison in the future. To compare different cities and experiences would help to see how mechanization, through this transport machine, was globalized. By the 1910s not only Europe and the USA had implemented metros, also South America: what kind of modern passengers these different cultures built up? While we might agree that modernity is uneven – or, there are modernities – and that it needs to be scrutinised in local and historical contexts, to what extent the infrastructural subjectivity of the New York Subway is similar to the passenger built by other underground railways. Is it possible to identify certain aspects which are common to this particular infrastructure beyond the singularities of the city and its history?","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266211068993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

more comparative perspective is needed here since not only London but Paris were cities with large and iconic metro systems which modified daily urban experience and built new subjects. In fact, this book offers a well and solid theoretical frame to do this comparison in the future. To compare different cities and experiences would help to see how mechanization, through this transport machine, was globalized. By the 1910s not only Europe and the USA had implemented metros, also South America: what kind of modern passengers these different cultures built up? While we might agree that modernity is uneven – or, there are modernities – and that it needs to be scrutinised in local and historical contexts, to what extent the infrastructural subjectivity of the New York Subway is similar to the passenger built by other underground railways. Is it possible to identify certain aspects which are common to this particular infrastructure beyond the singularities of the city and its history?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《自行车和英国人:一部现代史》,作者:尼尔·卡特
这里需要更多的比较视角,因为不仅伦敦和巴黎都是拥有大型标志性地铁系统的城市,这些地铁系统改变了日常的城市体验,并建立了新的主题。事实上,这本书为将来进行这种比较提供了一个良好而坚实的理论框架。比较不同的城市和经验将有助于了解机械化是如何通过这台运输机器实现全球化的。到20世纪10年代,不仅欧洲和美国实施了地铁,南美洲也实施了地铁:这些不同文化建立了什么样的现代乘客?虽然我们可能会同意现代性是不平衡的——或者,现代性是存在的——并且需要在当地和历史背景下进行仔细审查,但纽约地铁的基础设施主体性在多大程度上与其他地下铁路建造的乘客相似。除了城市及其历史的独特性之外,是否有可能识别出这种特殊基础设施的某些共同之处?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working around exclusive infrastructure – African workers and their families navigating race and gender on Rhodesia Railways, 1945–1964 Skotovoz, pripiski and the “law of labour settlement”: Transportation planning and management in the USSR Corrigendum to “The road corvée: The persistence of the use of unpaid labour for road maintenance in nineteenth and twentieth century Estonia” Transport history: a niche moving toward the mainstream? Book Review: Motion in Maps. Maps in Motion. Mapping Stories and Movement through Time by Zef Segal and Bram Vannieuwenhuyze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1