{"title":"The Choice of Trade Policy in an International Differentiated Duopoly with Process R&D Investment under Uncertainty","authors":"I. Yang","doi":"10.20294/jgbt.2022.18.5.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate equilibrium pairs of modes of government intervention in an international differentiated duopoly with process R&D investment under uncertainty. Governments in each of the two countries choose direct R&D investment and quantity controls, or R&D subsidies to shift profits towards domestic firms. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach - For the analysis, we extend the model of Haaland and Kind (2008) to that with uncertainty and consider direct R&D investment and quantity controls besides R&D subsidies. Firms in each of the two countries produce differentiated products and governments in each compete via direct R&D investment and quantity controls, or R&D subsidies in a third-country market. In environments with low, high, and intermediate uncertainty, equilibrium pairs of modes of government intervention are examined. \nFindings - It is shown that (i) in an environment with low uncertainty, direct R&D investment and quantity controls by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are substitutes and not too close, and R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are complements and not too close; (ii) in an environment with high uncertainty, R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium regardless of the nature of the goods, except in the cases of too close substitutes and complements; and (iii) in an environment with intermediate uncertainty, R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are complements and not too close. Moreover, in an environment with intermediate uncertainty, there are two symmetric equilibria if the goods are substitutes and not too close and there are two asymmetric equilibria if the goods are substitutes and very close. \nResearch Implications - By analyzing the effects of direct R&D investment and quantity controls, and R&D subsidies in international markets under uncertainty, we can expect which government intervention appears in equilibrium.","PeriodicalId":190222,"journal":{"name":"International Academy of Global Business and Trade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academy of Global Business and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20294/jgbt.2022.18.5.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate equilibrium pairs of modes of government intervention in an international differentiated duopoly with process R&D investment under uncertainty. Governments in each of the two countries choose direct R&D investment and quantity controls, or R&D subsidies to shift profits towards domestic firms.
Design/Methodology/Approach - For the analysis, we extend the model of Haaland and Kind (2008) to that with uncertainty and consider direct R&D investment and quantity controls besides R&D subsidies. Firms in each of the two countries produce differentiated products and governments in each compete via direct R&D investment and quantity controls, or R&D subsidies in a third-country market. In environments with low, high, and intermediate uncertainty, equilibrium pairs of modes of government intervention are examined.
Findings - It is shown that (i) in an environment with low uncertainty, direct R&D investment and quantity controls by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are substitutes and not too close, and R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are complements and not too close; (ii) in an environment with high uncertainty, R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium regardless of the nature of the goods, except in the cases of too close substitutes and complements; and (iii) in an environment with intermediate uncertainty, R&D subsidies by each government is a unique equilibrium if the goods are complements and not too close. Moreover, in an environment with intermediate uncertainty, there are two symmetric equilibria if the goods are substitutes and not too close and there are two asymmetric equilibria if the goods are substitutes and very close.
Research Implications - By analyzing the effects of direct R&D investment and quantity controls, and R&D subsidies in international markets under uncertainty, we can expect which government intervention appears in equilibrium.
目的:研究不确定条件下具有过程研发投资的国际差异化双寡头垄断中政府干预模式的均衡对。两国政府都选择直接研发投资和数量控制,或者研发补贴来将利润转移给国内企业。设计/方法论/方法——为了进行分析,我们将Haaland and Kind(2008)的模型扩展到不确定性的模型,并考虑了研发补贴之外的直接研发投资和数量控制。两国企业生产差异化产品,两国政府通过直接研发投资、数量控制或研发补贴在第三国市场进行竞争。在具有低、高和中等不确定性的环境中,研究了政府干预模式的平衡对。研究结果表明:(1)在低不确定性环境下,当产品是替代品且不太接近时,各国政府的直接研发投入和数量控制是唯一均衡;当产品是互补且不太接近时,各国政府的研发补贴是唯一均衡;(2)在高不确定性环境下,除了替代品和互补关系过于密切的情况外,无论产品性质如何,各国政府的研发补贴都是唯一均衡;(3)在中等不确定性环境下,如果产品是互补且不太接近,各国政府的研发补贴是唯一均衡。此外,在具有中等不确定性的环境中,如果商品是替代品且不太接近,则存在两个对称均衡;如果商品是替代品且非常接近,则存在两个不对称均衡。研究启示——通过分析不确定条件下国际市场上研发直接投资、数量控制和研发补贴的影响,可以预测哪一种政府干预出现在均衡状态。