A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for acute mental health inpatients

L. Wainwright, G. Haddock, C. Dunster-Page, K. Berry
{"title":"A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for acute mental health inpatients","authors":"L. Wainwright, G. Haddock, C. Dunster-Page, K. Berry","doi":"10.12968/bjmh.2018.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inpatient wards provide an opportunity to intervene with medical, psychological and social care to contain distress and prevent future relapse. However, they have been criticised for an over-reliance on medication and risk management with limited psychosocial interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical trials of psychosocial interventions for inpatients to identify interventions that are effective at improving quality of life, symptoms or patient functioning. An electronic search of six databases was conducted for papers published from 1806 up until February 2017. A total of 18 randomised controlled trials was identified in which outcomes for symptoms, quality of life or functioning were reported. Overall, 15 trials showed a statistically significant result for at least one outcome. Seven categories were identified from the 18 studies, at least one in each category was found to be effective for symptoms, quality of life or functioning. The majority were effective (15 out of 18). Given that the methodological quality was generally low and number of randomised controlled trials were small, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Recommendations include more and repeated trials using rigorous methods of testing and reporting.","PeriodicalId":149493,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2018.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inpatient wards provide an opportunity to intervene with medical, psychological and social care to contain distress and prevent future relapse. However, they have been criticised for an over-reliance on medication and risk management with limited psychosocial interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical trials of psychosocial interventions for inpatients to identify interventions that are effective at improving quality of life, symptoms or patient functioning. An electronic search of six databases was conducted for papers published from 1806 up until February 2017. A total of 18 randomised controlled trials was identified in which outcomes for symptoms, quality of life or functioning were reported. Overall, 15 trials showed a statistically significant result for at least one outcome. Seven categories were identified from the 18 studies, at least one in each category was found to be effective for symptoms, quality of life or functioning. The majority were effective (15 out of 18). Given that the methodological quality was generally low and number of randomised controlled trials were small, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Recommendations include more and repeated trials using rigorous methods of testing and reporting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性精神健康住院患者的随机对照试验的社会心理干预的系统回顾
住院病房提供了通过医疗、心理和社会护理进行干预的机会,以遏制痛苦并防止今后复发。然而,他们因过度依赖药物和风险管理而受到批评,社会心理干预有限。本研究的目的是调查对住院病人进行心理社会干预的临床试验,以确定在改善生活质量、症状或患者功能方面有效的干预措施。对从1806年到2017年2月发表的论文进行了6个数据库的电子检索。总共确定了18个随机对照试验,其中报告了症状、生活质量或功能的结果。总体而言,15项试验显示至少有一项结果具有统计学意义。从18项研究中确定了七个类别,每个类别中至少有一个被发现对症状,生活质量或功能有效。大多数是有效的(15 / 18)。考虑到方法学质量普遍较低,随机对照试验数量较少,很难得出明确的结论。建议包括使用严格的测试和报告方法进行更多和重复的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How carers' needs can be met by staff within inpatient settings: a qualitative study Move to improve physical and mental health Community rehabilitation for people with severe and enduring mental health difficulties: a description and evaluation of a new community enhanced rehabilitation team Misuse of the Mental Capacity Act: ‘you have capacity to end your life and there is nothing we can do about it’ The experiences, views and beliefs of emerging adults and their carers of receiving adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic review and meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1