Moving towards more supportive fields: Communities of Practice (COPs), Community Action Networks (CANs), and Relational Communities of Practice (RCOPs)

Sally Denham‐Vaughan, Michael. Clark
{"title":"Moving towards more supportive fields: Communities of Practice (COPs), Community Action Networks (CANs), and Relational Communities of Practice (RCOPs)","authors":"Sally Denham‐Vaughan, Michael. Clark","doi":"10.53667/nsed9823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Abstract: Since its inception Gestalt psychotherapy has been ‘relational’. Indeed, the very notion of ‘contact’, a formulation lying at the heart of the theory, makes no sense without a concept of one variable, classically ‘organism’, coming up against another, classically ‘environment’ (see Perls, 1973; Polster and Polster, 1973, for more discussion). To advance scholarship and practice, however, requires us to reflect continually on both the nature and application of this relationality; determining whether or not Gestalt is still living up to these insights and aspirations, and in what new ways we might deliver good Gestalt practice, both with individuals and with groups and communities. In this paper we seek to contribute to this personal and community reflection as applied to working with communities and teams. We will therefore focus on a selection of ways that Gestalt theory can be applied to practical community-building strategies and the challenges that such applications pose. We will do this from the perspectives of theoretical discussion about the subject and personal experiences of approaches to community and team-building. We will suggest that, due to its flexible and relational qualities, a Gestalt approach is suited to being an approach of choice for creating more supportive communities and teams where individuals can flourish. We add that drawing explicitly on other theories about communities of practice and community action networks can add to our theoretical and practical sensitivities in this area. Key words: Gestalt, relational, community, authenticity, presence.\"","PeriodicalId":103162,"journal":{"name":"British Gestalt Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Gestalt Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53667/nsed9823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Abstract: Since its inception Gestalt psychotherapy has been ‘relational’. Indeed, the very notion of ‘contact’, a formulation lying at the heart of the theory, makes no sense without a concept of one variable, classically ‘organism’, coming up against another, classically ‘environment’ (see Perls, 1973; Polster and Polster, 1973, for more discussion). To advance scholarship and practice, however, requires us to reflect continually on both the nature and application of this relationality; determining whether or not Gestalt is still living up to these insights and aspirations, and in what new ways we might deliver good Gestalt practice, both with individuals and with groups and communities. In this paper we seek to contribute to this personal and community reflection as applied to working with communities and teams. We will therefore focus on a selection of ways that Gestalt theory can be applied to practical community-building strategies and the challenges that such applications pose. We will do this from the perspectives of theoretical discussion about the subject and personal experiences of approaches to community and team-building. We will suggest that, due to its flexible and relational qualities, a Gestalt approach is suited to being an approach of choice for creating more supportive communities and teams where individuals can flourish. We add that drawing explicitly on other theories about communities of practice and community action networks can add to our theoretical and practical sensitivities in this area. Key words: Gestalt, relational, community, authenticity, presence."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向更具支持性的领域发展:实践社区(cop)、社区行动网络(can)和关系实践社区(rcop)
摘要:格式塔心理治疗从一开始就是“关系”的。事实上,“接触”这个概念,这个理论的核心提法,如果没有一个变量(经典的“有机体”)与另一个变量(经典的“环境”)的概念,是没有意义的(见Perls, 1973;波尔斯特和波尔斯特,1973,更多的讨论)。然而,为了促进学术和实践,我们需要不断地反思这种关系的性质和应用;决定完形是否仍然符合这些见解和愿望,以及我们可以用什么新的方式来提供良好的完形练习,无论是对个人还是对团体和社区。在这篇论文中,我们试图将这种个人和社区的反思应用于与社区和团队的合作中。因此,我们将重点关注格式塔理论可以应用于实际社区建设策略的几种方式,以及这种应用所带来的挑战。我们将从关于这个主题的理论讨论和个人经验的角度来进行社区和团队建设。我们将建议,由于格式塔方法的灵活性和关联性,它适合作为一种选择方法,用于创建更多的支持性社区和团队,在那里个人可以蓬勃发展。我们补充说,明确借鉴关于实践社区和社区行动网络的其他理论可以增加我们在这一领域的理论和实践敏感性。关键词:格式塔,关系,社区,真实性,在场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a relational/compassionate Gestalt understanding of trauma and addiction In and out the gender pail Gaslighting: how does a plant survive on fake watering? Artistic creativity as a resource in the work of the psychological support group of Kharkiv Institute of Gestalt and Psychodrama during wartime The Cure: working with separation and loss through song parody (lyric substitution)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1