Work and Personality in Flexible Capitalism

V. Mele
{"title":"Work and Personality in Flexible Capitalism","authors":"V. Mele","doi":"10.1353/max.2019.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The focus of this article is the relation between work and personality in flexible capitalism. The concept of work still represents one of the major factors determining modern individuals’ ability (or inability) to formulate personal, stable identities that enable them to become fully socialized. Both Georg Simmel and Max Weber among the classics of German sociology make reference to a common theoretical background that views the human being as a creature with originally rational potential, who is faced with the task of becoming a personality by means of consciously chosen life behaviour. Drawing from classic as well as contemporary sociological theory, the article explores the two spheres of identity and work in flexible capitalism. Despite the complexity of modern subjectivity and the great number of its affiliations, the sphere of work still remains the de facto decisive sphere for recognition, socialization, self-esteem, and self-definition. It remains the field in which the ‘decisive plays’ for definition of subjectivity take place — and the struggle for its possible emancipation.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2019.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The focus of this article is the relation between work and personality in flexible capitalism. The concept of work still represents one of the major factors determining modern individuals’ ability (or inability) to formulate personal, stable identities that enable them to become fully socialized. Both Georg Simmel and Max Weber among the classics of German sociology make reference to a common theoretical background that views the human being as a creature with originally rational potential, who is faced with the task of becoming a personality by means of consciously chosen life behaviour. Drawing from classic as well as contemporary sociological theory, the article explores the two spheres of identity and work in flexible capitalism. Despite the complexity of modern subjectivity and the great number of its affiliations, the sphere of work still remains the de facto decisive sphere for recognition, socialization, self-esteem, and self-definition. It remains the field in which the ‘decisive plays’ for definition of subjectivity take place — and the struggle for its possible emancipation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵活资本主义中的工作与人格
摘要:本文的研究重点是柔性资本主义下工作与人格的关系。工作的概念仍然是决定现代个人是否有能力(或没有能力)形成个人的、稳定的身份,使他们能够完全社会化的主要因素之一。德国社会学的经典著作中,齐美尔和韦伯都提到了一个共同的理论背景,即认为人是一种具有原始理性潜能的生物,人面临着通过有意识地选择生活行为而成为人格的任务。本文借鉴经典和当代社会学理论,探讨了灵活资本主义中的身份和工作两个领域。尽管现代主体性的复杂性和它的大量从属关系,工作领域实际上仍然是承认、社会化、自尊和自我定义的决定性领域。它仍然是为定义主体性而进行的“决定性的游戏”和为其可能的解放而进行的斗争的场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1