Copyright implications for the aggregation of audiovisual content in Greece

Afrodite Malliari, Ilias Nitsos, Sofia Zapounidou, S. Doropoulos
{"title":"Copyright implications for the aggregation of audiovisual content in Greece","authors":"Afrodite Malliari, Ilias Nitsos, Sofia Zapounidou, S. Doropoulos","doi":"10.1108/dlp-04-2022-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to attempt to provide an overview of the copyright legal framework for audiovisual resources in Europe and Greece, how Audiovisual (AV) content is currently licensed by Greek providers and how licenses or copyright exceptions enable its reuse. The motivation for this work was the development of an aggregation service for audiovisual resources in Greece, the Open AudioVisual Archives (OAVA) platform.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nCopyright licenses and exceptions in the European Union and in Greek Legislation have been thoroughly reviewed along with the reuse of content, based on the terms of Fair Use, Rights Statements and Creative Commons. Licensing issues for the most well-known aggregation services, such as Europeana, Digital Public Library of America, Trove, Digital New Zealand and the National Digital Library of India, have also been studied and considered. Audiovisual content providers in Greece have been recorded, and their licensing preferences have been analyzed. Pearson’s chi-square test was applied to test the relationship between the provider’s type, resources’ genre and licenses used.\n\n\nFindings\nDespite the abundance of copyright legislation in the European Union and in Greece, audiovisual content providers in Greece seem to ignore it or find it difficult to choose the right license. More than half of them choose to publish their resources on popular audiovisual platforms using the default licensing option provided. Creative Commons licenses are preferred for audiovisual content that falls into the following categories: open courses (almost exclusively) and interviews and digital collection/research projects (about half of the content).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper examines audiovisual content aggregation, in the EU and Greece, from a legal point of view. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first attempt to record and analyze the licensing preferences of Greek AV content providers.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-04-2022-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to attempt to provide an overview of the copyright legal framework for audiovisual resources in Europe and Greece, how Audiovisual (AV) content is currently licensed by Greek providers and how licenses or copyright exceptions enable its reuse. The motivation for this work was the development of an aggregation service for audiovisual resources in Greece, the Open AudioVisual Archives (OAVA) platform. Design/methodology/approach Copyright licenses and exceptions in the European Union and in Greek Legislation have been thoroughly reviewed along with the reuse of content, based on the terms of Fair Use, Rights Statements and Creative Commons. Licensing issues for the most well-known aggregation services, such as Europeana, Digital Public Library of America, Trove, Digital New Zealand and the National Digital Library of India, have also been studied and considered. Audiovisual content providers in Greece have been recorded, and their licensing preferences have been analyzed. Pearson’s chi-square test was applied to test the relationship between the provider’s type, resources’ genre and licenses used. Findings Despite the abundance of copyright legislation in the European Union and in Greece, audiovisual content providers in Greece seem to ignore it or find it difficult to choose the right license. More than half of them choose to publish their resources on popular audiovisual platforms using the default licensing option provided. Creative Commons licenses are preferred for audiovisual content that falls into the following categories: open courses (almost exclusively) and interviews and digital collection/research projects (about half of the content). Originality/value This paper examines audiovisual content aggregation, in the EU and Greece, from a legal point of view. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first attempt to record and analyze the licensing preferences of Greek AV content providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊视听内容聚合对版权的影响
本文旨在概述欧洲和希腊视听资源的版权法律框架,希腊供应商目前如何对视听(AV)内容进行许可,以及许可或版权例外如何使其能够重复使用。这项工作的动机是在希腊开发一个视听资源聚合服务,即开放视听档案(OAVA)平台。设计/方法/方法基于合理使用、权利声明和知识共享条款,对欧盟和希腊立法中的版权许可和例外情况以及内容的再利用进行了彻底的审查。最著名的聚合服务(如Europeana、美国数字公共图书馆、Trove、数字新西兰和印度国家数字图书馆)的许可问题也得到了研究和考虑。记录了希腊的视听内容提供商,并分析了他们的许可偏好。采用Pearson卡方检验检验提供商类型、资源类型和使用许可之间的关系。尽管欧盟和希腊有丰富的版权立法,但希腊的视听内容提供商似乎忽略了它,或者发现很难选择正确的许可。超过一半的人选择使用提供的默认许可选项在流行的视听平台上发布他们的资源。知识共享许可适用于以下类别的视听内容:公开课程(几乎全部)、访谈和数字收集/研究项目(约占内容的一半)。原创性/价值本文从法律角度考察了欧盟和希腊的视听内容聚合。据作者所知,这是第一次尝试记录和分析希腊AV内容提供商的许可偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1