The Development of Procedural Law Through the E-Court System After Pandemic in Indonesia

Herina Wati, T. Kamello, Marlia Sastro
{"title":"The Development of Procedural Law Through the E-Court System After Pandemic in Indonesia","authors":"Herina Wati, T. Kamello, Marlia Sastro","doi":"10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological developments and Covid 19 Pandemic \"forced\" the Supreme Court (MA) to make breakthrough in procedural law, namely by launching E-Court application, through MA rules Number 3 of 2018 which was exchanged for rules Number 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Trial in E-Courts. E-Court is instrument in court for service of case registration depositing case money to court summons and trial and online delivery of court documents. This study aims to analyze and provide an overview to public of breakthroughs made by the MA for Development of Procedural Law through e-court system. Research method used qualitative research, normative juridical approach. The development of procedural law was initially only intended for registration and examination of civil cases through Supreme Court rules (Perma) No. 3 of 2018 was replaced with Perma No. 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Trial in Electronic Courts. But then e-court is not only for civil cases, it’s also to adjudicate criminal cases with issuance of MA regarding the online criminal trial file Number 4 of 2020. The application for electronic proceedings is an attempt by the Supreme Court to eliminate the obstacles commonly experienced by the judiciary, namely the lack of speed in resolving cases, the difficulty of obtaining data from the court, and the credibility of the integrity of the judiciary, especially judges","PeriodicalId":165691,"journal":{"name":"Veteran Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veteran Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological developments and Covid 19 Pandemic "forced" the Supreme Court (MA) to make breakthrough in procedural law, namely by launching E-Court application, through MA rules Number 3 of 2018 which was exchanged for rules Number 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Trial in E-Courts. E-Court is instrument in court for service of case registration depositing case money to court summons and trial and online delivery of court documents. This study aims to analyze and provide an overview to public of breakthroughs made by the MA for Development of Procedural Law through e-court system. Research method used qualitative research, normative juridical approach. The development of procedural law was initially only intended for registration and examination of civil cases through Supreme Court rules (Perma) No. 3 of 2018 was replaced with Perma No. 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Trial in Electronic Courts. But then e-court is not only for civil cases, it’s also to adjudicate criminal cases with issuance of MA regarding the online criminal trial file Number 4 of 2020. The application for electronic proceedings is an attempt by the Supreme Court to eliminate the obstacles commonly experienced by the judiciary, namely the lack of speed in resolving cases, the difficulty of obtaining data from the court, and the credibility of the integrity of the judiciary, especially judges
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼大流行后电子法院制度对程序法的发展
技术发展和新冠肺炎疫情“迫使”最高法院在程序法上取得突破,即启动电子法院申请,将2018年最高法院第3号规则替换为2019年关于电子法院案件管理和审判的第1号规则。电子法庭是在法庭上送达案件登记的文书,存放案件款项予法庭传票和审判,以及在网上传送法庭文件。本研究旨在分析并向公众概述电子法院制度在程序法发展方面所取得的突破。研究方法采用定性研究、规范法学方法。程序法的发展最初仅针对民事案件的登记和审查,最高法院2018年第3号规则被2019年《关于电子法院案件管理和审判的第1号规则》所取代。但是,电子法院不仅审理民事案件,还审理刑事案件,并发布了关于2020年网络刑事审判文件4号的MA。申请电子诉讼程序是最高法院试图消除司法机构通常遇到的障碍,即解决案件的速度不够快,从法院获得数据的困难,以及司法机构,特别是法官的诚信的信誉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Criminal Law Approach to Absentee Land Ownership as A Form of Legal Protection by The State Amicus Curiae: Position and Role in Issuing Decisions by Judges as an Effort to Achieve Substantive Justice Corporate Crime in Smuggling Illegal Foreign Workers in Indonesia PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH WANITA DALAM PEREDARAN NARKOTIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM LALU LINTAS JALAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI WUJUD PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM WILAYAH HUKUM JAKARTA SELATAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1