Analysis of stopping behaviour of cyclists at a traffic light-controlled intersection using trajectory data

Claudia Leschik, Meng Zhang, Kay Gimm
{"title":"Analysis of stopping behaviour of cyclists at a traffic light-controlled intersection using trajectory data","authors":"Claudia Leschik, Meng Zhang, Kay Gimm","doi":"10.59490/64f6c1c17d4743f56ed1665c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyclists have various route options to get to their destination. They can share lanes with vehicles, share lanes with pedestrians, or have their own lane. In Germany there are often marked lanes across intersections and stop lines in front of the crossing, guiding the cyclists their way. However, these markings are not always respected in the way they should be.\n\nThis study is intended to examine the stopping behaviour of cyclists at a traffic light-controlled intersection. A distinction was made between cyclists riding alone (n = 1,411) and cyclists riding in groups (more than one cyclist; n = 475). The stopping area was divided into polygons to understand where most people stop before an intersection. Furthermore, it was examined where people continued to ride after stopping (path marked for cyclists or path marked for pedestrians) and this was compared with cyclists who did not stop.\n\nThe aim of this study is to investigate cyclists’ stopping behaviour (e.g. stopping position) at intersections with consideration of the impact of groups, wrong-way riding and road usage. It is to be investigated whether cyclists alone behave differently than cyclists in groups and whether there are differences in the two groups for wrong way cyclists. Both - cyclists alone (69.38%) and cyclists in groups (84.57%) - crossed the intersection more frequently without stopping within the observation period. In all cases, cyclists stopped more often at the bicycle stopping line or used the special marked bicycle lane, thereby complying with the law. Most wrong way cyclists on the special marked bicycle lane were found for cyclists alone with stopping (10%, n = 27) and cyclists in groups with stopping (8%, n = 12). The speeds were also compared. The speeds between cyclists alone and cyclists in groups differ slightly, and the stopping behaviour is very similar if the special marked bicycle lane is used after the stop.\n\nThe information can be used to improve models of cyclists’ behaviour, for example in microscopic simulations, in which cyclists only stop at clearly defined locations. Furthermore, the results of this study will provide further knowledge, which help developing autonomous driving functions correctly anticipating cycle behaviour at intersections.","PeriodicalId":141471,"journal":{"name":"The Evolving Scholar - BMD 2023, 5th Edition","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Evolving Scholar - BMD 2023, 5th Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59490/64f6c1c17d4743f56ed1665c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyclists have various route options to get to their destination. They can share lanes with vehicles, share lanes with pedestrians, or have their own lane. In Germany there are often marked lanes across intersections and stop lines in front of the crossing, guiding the cyclists their way. However, these markings are not always respected in the way they should be. This study is intended to examine the stopping behaviour of cyclists at a traffic light-controlled intersection. A distinction was made between cyclists riding alone (n = 1,411) and cyclists riding in groups (more than one cyclist; n = 475). The stopping area was divided into polygons to understand where most people stop before an intersection. Furthermore, it was examined where people continued to ride after stopping (path marked for cyclists or path marked for pedestrians) and this was compared with cyclists who did not stop. The aim of this study is to investigate cyclists’ stopping behaviour (e.g. stopping position) at intersections with consideration of the impact of groups, wrong-way riding and road usage. It is to be investigated whether cyclists alone behave differently than cyclists in groups and whether there are differences in the two groups for wrong way cyclists. Both - cyclists alone (69.38%) and cyclists in groups (84.57%) - crossed the intersection more frequently without stopping within the observation period. In all cases, cyclists stopped more often at the bicycle stopping line or used the special marked bicycle lane, thereby complying with the law. Most wrong way cyclists on the special marked bicycle lane were found for cyclists alone with stopping (10%, n = 27) and cyclists in groups with stopping (8%, n = 12). The speeds were also compared. The speeds between cyclists alone and cyclists in groups differ slightly, and the stopping behaviour is very similar if the special marked bicycle lane is used after the stop. The information can be used to improve models of cyclists’ behaviour, for example in microscopic simulations, in which cyclists only stop at clearly defined locations. Furthermore, the results of this study will provide further knowledge, which help developing autonomous driving functions correctly anticipating cycle behaviour at intersections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用轨迹数据分析交通灯控制十字路口骑自行车者的停车行为
骑自行车的人有各种各样的路线可以选择到达目的地。它们可以与车辆共用车道,与行人共用车道,或者拥有自己的车道。在德国,十字路口通常有明确的车道,十字路口前也有停车线,为骑自行车的人指路。然而,这些标志并不总是得到应有的尊重。这项研究的目的是检查在交通信号灯控制的十字路口骑自行车的人的停车行为。在单独骑行(n = 1411)和集体骑行(多于一个骑行者;N = 475)。停车区域被划分为多边形,以了解大多数人在十字路口前停车的地方。此外,研究人员还检查了人们在停车后继续骑车的地方(为骑自行车的人标记的路径或为行人标记的路径),并将其与没有停车的骑自行车的人进行比较。本研究的目的是调查骑车者在十字路口的停车行为(例如停车位置),同时考虑到群体的影响,错误的骑行和道路使用。要调查的是,单独骑自行车的人和集体骑自行车的人的行为是否不同,以及两组骑错路的人的行为是否存在差异。在观察期内,骑自行车的人(69.38%)和骑自行车的人(84.57%)在不停车的情况下更频繁地穿过十字路口。在所有情况下,骑自行车的人更多地停在自行车停车线或使用特殊标记的自行车道,从而遵守了法律。在自行车专用道上,骑错方向最多的是单独停车的骑行者(10%,n = 27)和集体停车的骑行者(8%,n = 12)。速度也进行了比较。骑自行车的人和骑自行车的人的速度略有不同,如果在停车后使用特殊标记的自行车道,则停车行为非常相似。这些信息可用于改进骑自行车者行为的模型,例如在微观模拟中,骑自行车者只在明确界定的位置停车。此外,这项研究的结果将提供进一步的知识,这有助于开发自动驾驶功能,正确预测十字路口的循环行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of tire multi-physical modeling methodologies for the preliminary definition of a racing motorcycle setup Application of tire multi-physical modeling methodologies for the preliminary definition of a racing motorcycle setup New design approach for leaf-springs in motorcycles Improvement of Cycling Efficiency for Drivetrains with Elasticity Analysis of stopping behaviour of cyclists at a traffic light-controlled intersection using trajectory data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1