Between traffic and walking discourse: Pedestrians in the traffic machine, hints from the Estonian case

T. Tuvikene
{"title":"Between traffic and walking discourse: Pedestrians in the traffic machine, hints from the Estonian case","authors":"T. Tuvikene","doi":"10.1177/00225266231179557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Walking has attracted increasing interest in the social sciences and humanities. Yet only rarely have studies in those disciplines considered the subject of traffic, leaving governing and regulations to traffic specialists and engineers. Primarily using conceptual reflections but intersecting these with an analysis of historical traffic regulations in Estonia as they are related to contemporary framings, this article introduces the pedestrian as an element of a traffic system who is governed to control her body in legally prescribed ways. Directing attention also to language, as the vignette from Estonia shows the existence of a particular word “liikleja” for the ways in which pedestrians are seen as being subject to the traffic system as disciplined elements of the traffic machine. The article describes such perspective as “traffic discourse” which is contrasted with the more holistic view of pedestrians present in walking studies (“walking discourse”).","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266231179557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walking has attracted increasing interest in the social sciences and humanities. Yet only rarely have studies in those disciplines considered the subject of traffic, leaving governing and regulations to traffic specialists and engineers. Primarily using conceptual reflections but intersecting these with an analysis of historical traffic regulations in Estonia as they are related to contemporary framings, this article introduces the pedestrian as an element of a traffic system who is governed to control her body in legally prescribed ways. Directing attention also to language, as the vignette from Estonia shows the existence of a particular word “liikleja” for the ways in which pedestrians are seen as being subject to the traffic system as disciplined elements of the traffic machine. The article describes such perspective as “traffic discourse” which is contrasted with the more holistic view of pedestrians present in walking studies (“walking discourse”).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交通与步行话语之间:交通机器中的行人,来自爱沙尼亚案例的暗示
步行吸引了人们对社会科学和人文科学越来越多的兴趣。然而,这些学科的研究很少考虑交通问题,把管理和法规留给交通专家和工程师。本文主要使用概念反思,但将其与爱沙尼亚历史交通法规的分析相结合,因为它们与当代框架有关,本文将行人作为交通系统的一个元素,以法律规定的方式控制她的身体。语言也引起了人们的注意,正如爱沙尼亚的小插图所显示的那样,存在一个特定的词“lilikleja”,它表示行人被视为交通系统的一部分,是交通机器中有纪律的元素。文章将这种视角描述为“交通话语”,与步行研究中对行人的更全面的看法(“步行话语”)形成对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working around exclusive infrastructure – African workers and their families navigating race and gender on Rhodesia Railways, 1945–1964 Skotovoz, pripiski and the “law of labour settlement”: Transportation planning and management in the USSR Corrigendum to “The road corvée: The persistence of the use of unpaid labour for road maintenance in nineteenth and twentieth century Estonia” Transport history: a niche moving toward the mainstream? Book Review: Motion in Maps. Maps in Motion. Mapping Stories and Movement through Time by Zef Segal and Bram Vannieuwenhuyze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1