{"title":"Friedrich Creuzers und Johann Theodor Voemels byzantinistische Impulse.","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.18.07JEC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1825, Johann Theodor Voemel published Nicholas of Methone’s (12th century)\nRefutatio institutionis theologicae Procli Platonici. Thus, for the first time an\nimportant document of Byzantine philosophy became accessible to researchers,\nwhich also allowed important insights into the medieval history of the reception\nof Proclus’ Institutio theologica in the Byzantine Empire. The essay reconstructs\nthe genesis of this edition and the history of its early reception. While it focuses\non Creuzer’s contribution to the publication of Refutatio, it also takes the achievements\nof Johann Theodor Voemel and Carl Ullmann into consideration. In so\ndoing, the essay provides new findings concerning the study of Neoplatonism\nduring the classical period of German philosophy.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.18.07JEC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 1825, Johann Theodor Voemel published Nicholas of Methone’s (12th century)
Refutatio institutionis theologicae Procli Platonici. Thus, for the first time an
important document of Byzantine philosophy became accessible to researchers,
which also allowed important insights into the medieval history of the reception
of Proclus’ Institutio theologica in the Byzantine Empire. The essay reconstructs
the genesis of this edition and the history of its early reception. While it focuses
on Creuzer’s contribution to the publication of Refutatio, it also takes the achievements
of Johann Theodor Voemel and Carl Ullmann into consideration. In so
doing, the essay provides new findings concerning the study of Neoplatonism
during the classical period of German philosophy.