Friedrich Creuzers und Johann Theodor Voemels byzantinistische Impulse.

Udo Reinhold Jeck
{"title":"Friedrich Creuzers und Johann Theodor Voemels byzantinistische Impulse.","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.18.07JEC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1825, Johann Theodor Voemel published Nicholas of Methone’s (12th century)\nRefutatio institutionis theologicae Procli Platonici. Thus, for the first time an\nimportant document of Byzantine philosophy became accessible to researchers,\nwhich also allowed important insights into the medieval history of the reception\nof Proclus’ Institutio theologica in the Byzantine Empire. The essay reconstructs\nthe genesis of this edition and the history of its early reception. While it focuses\non Creuzer’s contribution to the publication of Refutatio, it also takes the achievements\nof Johann Theodor Voemel and Carl Ullmann into consideration. In so\ndoing, the essay provides new findings concerning the study of Neoplatonism\nduring the classical period of German philosophy.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.18.07JEC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1825, Johann Theodor Voemel published Nicholas of Methone’s (12th century) Refutatio institutionis theologicae Procli Platonici. Thus, for the first time an important document of Byzantine philosophy became accessible to researchers, which also allowed important insights into the medieval history of the reception of Proclus’ Institutio theologica in the Byzantine Empire. The essay reconstructs the genesis of this edition and the history of its early reception. While it focuses on Creuzer’s contribution to the publication of Refutatio, it also takes the achievements of Johann Theodor Voemel and Carl Ullmann into consideration. In so doing, the essay provides new findings concerning the study of Neoplatonism during the classical period of German philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗里德里希·克鲁泽和约翰·西奥多·Voemels拜占庭冲动
1825年,约翰·特奥多尔·沃梅尔出版了尼古拉斯·梅洛尼(12世纪)的《驳斥神学机构》(refuatio institutionis theologae Procli Platonici)。因此,研究人员第一次可以接触到拜占庭哲学的重要文献,这也使得人们对中世纪拜占庭帝国接受普罗克劳斯的神学制度的历史有了重要的了解。本文重建了这个版本的起源和它的早期接受的历史。虽然它侧重于克鲁泽对《反驳》出版的贡献,但它也考虑到了约翰·西奥多·沃梅尔和卡尔·乌尔曼的成就。因此,本文对德国哲学古典时期新柏拉图主义的研究提供了新的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Chaldäischen Orakel in proklos philosophie Kritik über Leeten (2019): Redepraxis als Lebenspraxis. Die diskursive Kultur der antiken Ethik Kritik über Hengelbrock (2018): Zeit und Freizeit: Seneca, Epistulae morales Proclus armeniacus “Mirum est si intellectus noster omnem scientiam accipiens ex phantasmate”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1