Neoclassical Realist Theory, Alliance Politics, and Nonproliferation

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro
{"title":"Neoclassical Realist Theory, Alliance Politics, and Nonproliferation","authors":"Jeffrey W. Taliaferro","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190939304.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 develops neoclassical realist theory. It explicates how the two systemic variables—the current distribution of power in a region and the time horizons for threats to the hegemon’s interests in that region—can create incentives for US presidential administrations to favor coercive or accommodative strategies toward a vulnerable ally seeking nuclear weapons. When confronted with such high domestic mobilization hurdles to their preferred strategies, however, administrations will pursue hybrid strategies—ones that combine accommodative and coercive elements—toward an ally. This chapter unpacks the measurement of the variables and the types of empirical evidence that might confirm or disconfirm the hypotheses. It also outlines three alternative explanations (nuclear domino theory, security commitment theory, and credible sanctions theory) and the types of evidence that might confirm or disconfirm their hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":150717,"journal":{"name":"Defending Frenemies","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defending Frenemies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190939304.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 2 develops neoclassical realist theory. It explicates how the two systemic variables—the current distribution of power in a region and the time horizons for threats to the hegemon’s interests in that region—can create incentives for US presidential administrations to favor coercive or accommodative strategies toward a vulnerable ally seeking nuclear weapons. When confronted with such high domestic mobilization hurdles to their preferred strategies, however, administrations will pursue hybrid strategies—ones that combine accommodative and coercive elements—toward an ally. This chapter unpacks the measurement of the variables and the types of empirical evidence that might confirm or disconfirm the hypotheses. It also outlines three alternative explanations (nuclear domino theory, security commitment theory, and credible sanctions theory) and the types of evidence that might confirm or disconfirm their hypotheses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新古典现实主义理论、联盟政治与防扩散
第二章发展新古典现实主义理论。它解释了两个系统变量——一个地区当前的权力分配和该地区霸权利益受到威胁的时间范围——如何激励美国总统政府对寻求核武器的脆弱盟友采取强制性或适应性战略。然而,当面对如此高的国内动员障碍时,政府将采取混合战略-将适应性和强制性因素结合起来-对盟友。本章揭示了变量的测量和可能证实或不证实假设的经验证据的类型。它还概述了三种可供选择的解释(核多米诺理论、安全承诺理论和可信制裁理论)以及可能证实或否定其假设的证据类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The United States and Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1961–1973 The United States and South Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1970–1981 Neoclassical Realist Theory, Alliance Politics, and Nonproliferation The United States and Taiwan’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1967–1978 The United States and Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1975–1990
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1