Coping with complexity: abstractions, models and data

H. Schwetman
{"title":"Coping with complexity: abstractions, models and data","authors":"H. Schwetman","doi":"10.1109/SIMSYM.2002.1000076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given, as follows. People have been dealing with complex systems since the dawn of time. They have tried to predict the weather, cure disease and interact with society, even in the most primitive of times. This talk argues that we (humans) have approached complex systems using a standard approach, utilizing the following steps: (1) collect data from (make observations of) the system, (2) create some useful abstractions of some features of the system, (3) develop a model of the system, and (4) use this model to try to predict future behavior of the system. Today, analysts use simulation models in exactly the same way. We observe the system, develop some abstractions, and then construct a simulation of the system. We then we use this model to make predictions about the future behavior of the system. The talk explores some earlier attempts at developing models. It then shows how simulation models are a natural outgrowth of these earlier models. The talk concludes with a discussion of tradeoffs associated with conducting systems analysis projects. The key question is: “if this stuff is so good, why don’'t more people use it?”","PeriodicalId":198576,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 35th Annual Simulation Symposium. SS 2002","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 35th Annual Simulation Symposium. SS 2002","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMSYM.2002.1000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given, as follows. People have been dealing with complex systems since the dawn of time. They have tried to predict the weather, cure disease and interact with society, even in the most primitive of times. This talk argues that we (humans) have approached complex systems using a standard approach, utilizing the following steps: (1) collect data from (make observations of) the system, (2) create some useful abstractions of some features of the system, (3) develop a model of the system, and (4) use this model to try to predict future behavior of the system. Today, analysts use simulation models in exactly the same way. We observe the system, develop some abstractions, and then construct a simulation of the system. We then we use this model to make predictions about the future behavior of the system. The talk explores some earlier attempts at developing models. It then shows how simulation models are a natural outgrowth of these earlier models. The talk concludes with a discussion of tradeoffs associated with conducting systems analysis projects. The key question is: “if this stuff is so good, why don’'t more people use it?”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理复杂性:抽象、模型和数据
仅给出摘要形式,如下。从一开始,人们就一直在处理复杂的系统。甚至在最原始的时代,他们就试图预测天气、治疗疾病和与社会互动。这个演讲认为,我们(人类)已经使用一种标准的方法来接近复杂的系统,利用以下步骤:(1)从系统中收集数据(观察),(2)对系统的某些特征创建一些有用的抽象,(3)开发系统模型,(4)使用这个模型来尝试预测系统的未来行为。今天,分析师们以完全相同的方式使用模拟模型。我们对系统进行观察,开发一些抽象概念,然后构建系统的仿真。然后我们用这个模型来预测系统的未来行为。这次演讲探讨了一些早期开发模型的尝试。然后,它显示了模拟模型是这些早期模型的自然产物。讲座最后讨论了与执行系统分析项目相关的权衡。关键问题是:“如果这个东西这么好,为什么没有更多的人使用它?””
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approximate simulation of distributed-memory multithreaded multiprocessors Scheduling a job mix in a partitionable parallel system Animating 3D facial models with MPEG-4 FaceDefTables Ranking a list of discrete-event models Controlling buffer usage in critical channel traversing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1