The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges

IF 8.7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Strategic Information Systems Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101683
Marco Marabelli , Sue Newell , Valerie Handunge
{"title":"The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges","authors":"Marco Marabelli ,&nbsp;Sue Newell ,&nbsp;Valerie Handunge","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this viewpoint article we discuss algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS), which we view as organizational sociotechnical systems with their use in practice having consequences within and beyond organizational boundaries. We build a framework that revolves around the ADMS lifecycle and propose that each phase challenges organizations with “choices” related to technical and processual characteristics – ways to design, implement and use these systems in practice. We argue that it is important that organizations make these strategic choices with awareness and responsibly, as ADMS’ consequences affect a broad array of stakeholders (the workforce, suppliers, customers and society at-large) and involve ethical considerations. With this article we make two main contributions. First, we identify key choices associated with the design, implementation and use in practice of ADMS in organizations, that build on past literature and are tied to timely industry-related examples. Second, we provide IS scholars with a broad research agenda that will promote the generation of new knowledge and original theorizing within the domain of the strategic applications of ADMS in organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"30 3","pages":"Article 101683"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101683","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In this viewpoint article we discuss algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS), which we view as organizational sociotechnical systems with their use in practice having consequences within and beyond organizational boundaries. We build a framework that revolves around the ADMS lifecycle and propose that each phase challenges organizations with “choices” related to technical and processual characteristics – ways to design, implement and use these systems in practice. We argue that it is important that organizations make these strategic choices with awareness and responsibly, as ADMS’ consequences affect a broad array of stakeholders (the workforce, suppliers, customers and society at-large) and involve ethical considerations. With this article we make two main contributions. First, we identify key choices associated with the design, implementation and use in practice of ADMS in organizations, that build on past literature and are tied to timely industry-related examples. Second, we provide IS scholars with a broad research agenda that will promote the generation of new knowledge and original theorizing within the domain of the strategic applications of ADMS in organizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法决策系统的生命周期:组织选择和伦理挑战
在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了算法决策系统(ADMS),我们将其视为组织的社会技术系统,它们在实践中的使用在组织边界内外都有影响。我们建立了一个围绕ADMS生命周期的框架,并提出每个阶段都向组织提出与技术和流程特征相关的“选择”——在实践中设计、实施和使用这些系统的方法。我们认为,重要的是,组织做出这些战略选择的意识和负责任的,因为ADMS的后果影响到广泛的利益相关者(劳动力,供应商,客户和整个社会),并涉及道德考虑。在本文中,我们做出了两个主要贡献。首先,我们确定了与组织中ADMS的设计、实施和实践使用相关的关键选择,这些选择建立在过去的文献基础上,并与及时的行业相关示例联系在一起。其次,我们为信息系统学者提供了一个广泛的研究议程,这将促进组织中ADMS战略应用领域的新知识和原创理论的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Journal of Strategic Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems focuses on the strategic management, business and organizational issues associated with the introduction and utilization of information systems, and considers these issues in a global context. The emphasis is on the incorporation of IT into organizations'' strategic thinking, strategy alignment, organizational arrangements and management of change issues.
期刊最新文献
Do CEOs matter? Divergent impact of CEO power on digital and non-digital innovation A knowledge-centric model for government-orchestrated digital transformation among the microbusiness sector A process model for design-oriented machine learning research in information systems Is AI a strategic IS? Reflections and opportunities for research A socio-cognitive perspective of knowledge integration in digital innovation networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1