CLINICIANS DILEMMA: FALSELY UNDETECTED TSH LEVELS DUE TO TSH ISOFORM ON POPULAR COMMERCIAL IMMUNOASSAY IN INDIAN SUBJECT AND RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Pawan Kumar, Parul Sharma, Megha Tomar, Ravi Tomar
{"title":"CLINICIANS DILEMMA: FALSELY UNDETECTED TSH LEVELS DUE TO TSH ISOFORM ON POPULAR COMMERCIAL IMMUNOASSAY IN INDIAN SUBJECT AND RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"Pawan Kumar, Parul Sharma, Megha Tomar, Ravi Tomar","doi":"10.56557/jocrims/2022/v8i17572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: TSH is one of the most routinely measured tests the clinical laboratory to diagnose and monitor thyroid diseases. TSH as the preferred screening test as recommended by The American Thyroid Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists for diagnosing thyroid dysfunction. Third-generation Ultra serum TSH assays have a functional sensitivity of 0.001 uIU/mL and have been considered highest among biochemical assay for assessing thyroid disorders. However, as observed in many clinical laboratories sometimes results of TSH assays are discordant among different immunoassay platforms. \nCase Report: TSH values of a 56 years old male on Siemens Attelica while TSH was found to be elevated on Abbott Architect 1000 and Beckman Coulter DXI800. Retrospective analysis revealed few other cases (8/190) approx. 4.2 % showed discordant TSH values. This was found to be possibly because of mutation in TSH beta region (R55G). \nConclusion: Our present study suggest that these individuals who shows <0.001 values on Siemens Attelica must be tested with other platforms to assure appropriate management of disease. Further, clinicians and laboratory staff need to be aware about TSH variants along with other reported interferences.","PeriodicalId":127851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Case Reports in Medical Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Case Reports in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56557/jocrims/2022/v8i17572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: TSH is one of the most routinely measured tests the clinical laboratory to diagnose and monitor thyroid diseases. TSH as the preferred screening test as recommended by The American Thyroid Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists for diagnosing thyroid dysfunction. Third-generation Ultra serum TSH assays have a functional sensitivity of 0.001 uIU/mL and have been considered highest among biochemical assay for assessing thyroid disorders. However, as observed in many clinical laboratories sometimes results of TSH assays are discordant among different immunoassay platforms. Case Report: TSH values of a 56 years old male on Siemens Attelica while TSH was found to be elevated on Abbott Architect 1000 and Beckman Coulter DXI800. Retrospective analysis revealed few other cases (8/190) approx. 4.2 % showed discordant TSH values. This was found to be possibly because of mutation in TSH beta region (R55G). Conclusion: Our present study suggest that these individuals who shows <0.001 values on Siemens Attelica must be tested with other platforms to assure appropriate management of disease. Further, clinicians and laboratory staff need to be aware about TSH variants along with other reported interferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生的困境:由于TSH异构体在印度流行的商业免疫分析和回顾性分析中错误地未检测TSH水平
简介:TSH是临床实验室诊断和监测甲状腺疾病最常用的常规检测之一。TSH是美国甲状腺协会和美国临床内分泌学家协会推荐用于诊断甲状腺功能障碍的首选筛查试验。第三代Ultra血清TSH检测的功能灵敏度为0.001 uIU/mL,被认为是评估甲状腺疾病的生化检测中最高的。然而,正如在许多临床实验室中观察到的,有时不同免疫分析平台的TSH测定结果不一致。病例报告:56岁男性患者在Siemens Attelica上发现TSH值升高,在Abbott Architect 1000和Beckman Coulter DXI800上发现TSH值升高。回顾性分析显示其他病例(8/190)约为少数。4.2% TSH值不一致。这可能是由于TSH β区(R55G)突变所致。结论:我们目前的研究表明,这些在Siemens Attelica上显示<0.001值的个体必须在其他平台上进行测试,以确保适当的疾病管理。此外,临床医生和实验室工作人员需要了解TSH变异以及其他已报道的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case Report of Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis and Herpes Zoster Skin Lesion: Its Diagnosis and Treatment Rare Skin Eruption Caused by Paracetamol: A Case of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis Periapical Pocket Cyst of Anterior Maxilla: A Case Report A Case of Warthin Tumor Highlighting the Diagnostic Dilemmas Encountered Clinical Observations of Hearing, Speech, Language and Swallowing Abilities in Locked-in Syndrome: A Case-based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1