Cultural Expertise in Italian Courts: Contexts, Cases, and Issues

Antonello Ciccozzi, G. Decarli
{"title":"Cultural Expertise in Italian Courts: Contexts, Cases, and Issues","authors":"Antonello Ciccozzi, G. Decarli","doi":"10.1108/S1059-433720190000078003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter contributes to a corpus of legal–anthropological studies concerning the role of cultural experts in legal institutions. It begins by identifying the reasons behind the fragile collaboration between Italian courts and cultural experts and outlining some of the consequences of this relationship. It then presents a collection of cases involving cultural experts including a focus on the L’Aquila trial recounted from first-hand experience by Antonello Ciccozzi, the anthropologist who acted as expert consultant. The conclusions attempt to summarize the “state of the art” of cultural expertise in Italian courts today and call for greater collaboration between law and anthropology as a means of guaranteeing a fair trial.","PeriodicalId":304111,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000078003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This chapter contributes to a corpus of legal–anthropological studies concerning the role of cultural experts in legal institutions. It begins by identifying the reasons behind the fragile collaboration between Italian courts and cultural experts and outlining some of the consequences of this relationship. It then presents a collection of cases involving cultural experts including a focus on the L’Aquila trial recounted from first-hand experience by Antonello Ciccozzi, the anthropologist who acted as expert consultant. The conclusions attempt to summarize the “state of the art” of cultural expertise in Italian courts today and call for greater collaboration between law and anthropology as a means of guaranteeing a fair trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利法院的文化专业知识:背景、案例和问题
本章是关于文化专家在法律制度中的作用的法律人类学研究的语料库。本文首先找出意大利法院和文化专家之间脆弱合作背后的原因,并概述了这种关系的一些后果。然后,它展示了一系列涉及文化专家的案例,包括对拉奎拉审判的关注,由担任专家顾问的人类学家安东内洛·奇科齐(Antonello Ciccozzi)从第一手经验中叙述。结论试图总结当今意大利法院文化专业知识的“现状”,并呼吁加强法律和人类学之间的合作,作为保证公平审判的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Expertise in Litigation in South Africa: Can the Western World Learn Anything from a Mixed, Pluralistic Legal System? Assessing Cultural Expertise in Portugal: Challenges and Opportunities Court Cases, Cultural Expertise, and “Female Genital Mutilation” in Europe Cultural Expertise in Italian Courts: Contexts, Cases, and Issues Cultural Expertise in Asylum Granting Procedure in Greece: Evaluating the Experiences and the Prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1