SOTERIOLOGI MENURUT PAULUS SEBAGAI DASAR TRADISI BAGI PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DALAM KONTEKS PLURALISME DI INDONESIA

Demianus Nataniel
{"title":"SOTERIOLOGI MENURUT PAULUS SEBAGAI DASAR TRADISI BAGI PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DALAM KONTEKS PLURALISME DI INDONESIA","authors":"Demianus Nataniel","doi":"10.37368/ja.v3i1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ronald H. Cram said “the radical dialogue is an appropriate religious education model in pluralism context”. He contended that the radical dialogue consists of the hospitality principles that goes beyond tolerance. Unfortunately, his argumentations have not been based on the biblical tradition. In this paper, therefore, I would like to propose soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters as a supporting tenet for implementing the radical dialogue in religious education, especially in Indonesian pluralism context. Based on the principles of soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters, Christian comunity in Indonesia will be provoked to implement the radical dialogue. In order to clarify how the principles of soteriology of the cross are approprieated with the concept of the radical dialogue, I will delineate an Indonesian pluralism context succintly and an appropriate model of religious education in the context respectively.","PeriodicalId":447909,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, dan Musik Gereja","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, dan Musik Gereja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v3i1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ronald H. Cram said “the radical dialogue is an appropriate religious education model in pluralism context”. He contended that the radical dialogue consists of the hospitality principles that goes beyond tolerance. Unfortunately, his argumentations have not been based on the biblical tradition. In this paper, therefore, I would like to propose soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters as a supporting tenet for implementing the radical dialogue in religious education, especially in Indonesian pluralism context. Based on the principles of soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters, Christian comunity in Indonesia will be provoked to implement the radical dialogue. In order to clarify how the principles of soteriology of the cross are approprieated with the concept of the radical dialogue, I will delineate an Indonesian pluralism context succintly and an appropriate model of religious education in the context respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据保罗的说法,动物学是在印度尼西亚实行宗教教育的传统基础
罗纳德·h·克拉姆(Ronald H. Cram)说:“激进对话是多元主义背景下合适的宗教教育模式”。他主张,激进的对话包括超越宽容的好客原则。不幸的是,他的论证并非基于圣经传统。因此,在本文中,我想提出保罗书信中的十字架救赎论,作为在宗教教育中实施激进对话的支持原则,特别是在印度尼西亚多元主义背景下。基于保罗书信中十字架救恩论的原则,印尼的基督徒团体将被激发去实施激进的对话。为了阐明十字架救赎论的原则如何与激进对话的概念相适应,我将分别简要地描述印度尼西亚多元主义背景和宗教教育的适当模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DIMENSI PASTORAL DALAM DOA: MENEMUKENALI PRAKTIK DOA YANG BERTANGGUNGJAWAB DALAM PELAYANAN PENDAMPINGAN DAN KONSELING PASTORAL SOTERIOLOGI MENURUT PAULUS SEBAGAI DASAR TRADISI BAGI PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DALAM KONTEKS PLURALISME DI INDONESIA Pendidikan Kristen Konteks Sekolah: 12 Pesan Untuk Guru dan Pengelola KONFLIK KEPEMIMPINAN DALAM PEKABARAN INJIL: SEBUAH PEMAKNAAN TERHADAP PERSELISIHAN PAULUS DAN BARNABAS DALAM KISAH PARA RASUL 15:35-41 DOA DAN HARAPAN AKAN ALLAH YANG MEMBEBASKAN SEBUAH TAFSIRAN POST-KOLONIAL DANIEL 9:1-27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1