Recreating the Godly Commonwealth: Urban Mission and Social Reform

Ryan Mallon
{"title":"Recreating the Godly Commonwealth: Urban Mission and Social Reform","authors":"Ryan Mallon","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter Seven examines the social activism of the dissenting churches both within Scotland’s cities and in reform societies, in particular focusing on how Thomas Chalmers’ ideal of the godly commonwealth was reinterpreted in its new voluntary context, following the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1845. That Act removed an important pillar of the Church of Scotland’s control over Scottish society and placed Scotland’s dissenters on an equal footing with the Establishment, providing an opportunity for co-operation – and competition – on social issues, in particular urban evangelisation. However, the results were decidedly mixed. Did the increasingly urban middle-class character of the Free Church, traditionally associated with Scotland’s older dissenting churches and at odds with the new church’s claim to represent all Scots, hamper Chalmers’ aim to instil the godly commonwealth ideal throughout Scotland and create a national church that appealed to all classes? By assessing the attempts to recreate Chalmers’ dream of a church-led urban mission and the co-operative efforts made by dissenters on social issues such as housing, this chapter examines the attempts of the dissenting churches to reclaim Scotland’s ‘sunken’ masses, and questions whether a dissenting social vision was possible in the post-godly commonwealth period of the mid-nineteenth century.","PeriodicalId":227963,"journal":{"name":"Dissent After Disruption","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissent After Disruption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter Seven examines the social activism of the dissenting churches both within Scotland’s cities and in reform societies, in particular focusing on how Thomas Chalmers’ ideal of the godly commonwealth was reinterpreted in its new voluntary context, following the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1845. That Act removed an important pillar of the Church of Scotland’s control over Scottish society and placed Scotland’s dissenters on an equal footing with the Establishment, providing an opportunity for co-operation – and competition – on social issues, in particular urban evangelisation. However, the results were decidedly mixed. Did the increasingly urban middle-class character of the Free Church, traditionally associated with Scotland’s older dissenting churches and at odds with the new church’s claim to represent all Scots, hamper Chalmers’ aim to instil the godly commonwealth ideal throughout Scotland and create a national church that appealed to all classes? By assessing the attempts to recreate Chalmers’ dream of a church-led urban mission and the co-operative efforts made by dissenters on social issues such as housing, this chapter examines the attempts of the dissenting churches to reclaim Scotland’s ‘sunken’ masses, and questions whether a dissenting social vision was possible in the post-godly commonwealth period of the mid-nineteenth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重建敬虔联邦:城市使命与社会改革
第七章考察了苏格兰城市和改革社会中不同教会的社会活动,特别关注托马斯·查尔默斯(Thomas Chalmers)的敬虔联邦理想是如何在1845年《济贫法修正案》(Poor Law Amendment Act)之后,在其新的自愿背景下被重新诠释的。该法案取消了苏格兰教会控制苏格兰社会的一个重要支柱,并将苏格兰的异见者置于与建制派平等的地位,为社会问题,特别是城市福音传播,提供了合作和竞争的机会。然而,结果却是喜忧参半。自由教会日益增长的城市中产阶级特征,传统上与苏格兰旧的异见教会联系在一起,与新教会声称代表所有苏格兰人的主张不一致,是否妨碍了查尔默斯在苏格兰灌输虔诚的联邦理想,并建立一个吸引所有阶级的国家教会的目标?通过评估重建查尔默斯(Chalmers)的教会领导的城市使命梦想的尝试,以及持不同政见者在住房等社会问题上的合作努力,本章考察了持不同政见者试图收回苏格兰“沉没”群众的尝试,并质疑在19世纪中期的后神英联邦时期,持不同政见者的社会愿景是否可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bigotry or Liberalism? Dissenting Politics and the Liberal Party New Lights: The Growth of Dissent and Voluntaryism in Scotland, 1712–1843 Scottish Education and Dissenting Division ‘Co-operation without Incorporation’: Dissenting Relations after the Disruption Recreating the Godly Commonwealth: Urban Mission and Social Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1