THE ISSUES OF THE DEFENCE AND SECURITY OF RUTHENIAN CITIES IN THE SEJMS OF THE POLISH-LITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH IN THE 15TH – FIRST HALF OF THE 17TH CENTURY

T. Hoshko
{"title":"THE ISSUES OF THE DEFENCE AND SECURITY OF RUTHENIAN CITIES IN THE SEJMS OF THE POLISH-LITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH IN THE 15TH – FIRST HALF OF THE 17TH CENTURY","authors":"T. Hoshko","doi":"10.15407/mics2019.06.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The difficult international situation and the constant threat of war forced the king and nobility to pay special attention to the issues of state defence. The problem was often discussed at the Sejm sessions, including the question of the defence and order in the cities. Private and small towns, too, were not deprived of attention. Not only townspeople but also representatives of the nobility, first of all, starosta or vice-starosta were often made responsible for strengthening the defence capability of cities. The Sejms considered the building and strengthening of city walls, measures that would prevent their destruction, and providing cities with all necessary to counter hostile attacks. The Sejm constitutions not only exempted cities from some taxes so that the funds were used to strengthen the city walls but also protected them from the possible lawlessness of the nobility. The Sejms also prescribed the duties of the cities in the event of war and their involvement in the pospolite ruszenie. True, despite the difficult international situation, most of the Sejms’ resolutions were only addressed to individual cities. In practice, the issues of development and strengthening of cities did not rise in the Sejms systematically.","PeriodicalId":287528,"journal":{"name":"City History, Culture, Society","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City History, Culture, Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/mics2019.06.067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The difficult international situation and the constant threat of war forced the king and nobility to pay special attention to the issues of state defence. The problem was often discussed at the Sejm sessions, including the question of the defence and order in the cities. Private and small towns, too, were not deprived of attention. Not only townspeople but also representatives of the nobility, first of all, starosta or vice-starosta were often made responsible for strengthening the defence capability of cities. The Sejms considered the building and strengthening of city walls, measures that would prevent their destruction, and providing cities with all necessary to counter hostile attacks. The Sejm constitutions not only exempted cities from some taxes so that the funds were used to strengthen the city walls but also protected them from the possible lawlessness of the nobility. The Sejms also prescribed the duties of the cities in the event of war and their involvement in the pospolite ruszenie. True, despite the difficult international situation, most of the Sejms’ resolutions were only addressed to individual cities. In practice, the issues of development and strengthening of cities did not rise in the Sejms systematically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
15世纪至17世纪上半叶波兰立陶宛联邦议会中鲁塞尼亚城市的防御和安全问题
艰难的国际形势和不断的战争威胁迫使国王和贵族们特别关注国防问题。这个问题经常在众议院会议上讨论,包括城市的防御和秩序问题。私人城镇和小城镇也没有受到忽视。不仅是市民,还有贵族的代表,首先,starosta或副starosta经常负责加强城市的防御能力。塞姆斯考虑建造和加强城墙,采取措施防止其被破坏,并为城市提供反击敌对攻击所必需的一切。瑟姆宪法不仅免除了城市的一些税收,这样资金就可以用来加强城墙,而且还保护他们免受贵族可能的无法无天的伤害。塞姆斯还规定了城市在发生战争时的职责,以及他们参与到战争中来的义务。诚然,尽管国际形势艰难,但议会的大多数决议只针对个别城市。实际上,发展和加强城市的问题并没有系统地出现在议会中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gained in Translation. Postmodern Architecture in Late Soviet Lithuania The Language of Mass Architectural Postmodernity Introduction: Situating the Socialist Postmodern Reclaiming Identity: The Postmodern Turn in the Vilnius Architecture of the 1980s Centre E Estate in Krakow’s Nowa Huta. The postmodern experiment in the heart of the Stalin era symbol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1