The clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the emergency department because of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock

P. Skoczyński
{"title":"The clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the emergency department because of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock","authors":"P. Skoczyński","doi":"10.36740/emems202201103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To present the clinical spectrum of the Emergency Department (ED) patients with presumed electrical shocks. \nMaterial and methods: The electronic recordings of the patients admitted to the ED of Unversity Hospital in Wroclaw between April 2020 and June 2021 were searched for the words: discharge, electrical storm, syncope, con¬vulsions. The received patients recordings were checked and all patients with electrical shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) both real and presumed were included into the study. Patients were divided into three groups: patients hospitalized due to adequate ICD discharges, patients hospitalized for other reason who had adequate interventions in the ICD memory and patients with incorrectly diagnosed ICD interventions. \nResults: The study group consisted of 26 patients. There was 18 men aged 65.9±10.9 and 8 women aged 68.1±12.4 (p=0.66). A total of 20 patients had electrical shocks confirmed by ICD memory checking and 6 patients had no ICD shocks. \nConclusions: ED visits due to discharges of ICDs are rare. The medical history of ICD discharge could be misleading, because some patients interpret different symptoms or acoustic signals of the ICDs as a discharge. The ICD patients with syncope, unconsciousness, history of seizures should have their ICD checked for the possible discharges.","PeriodicalId":433523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medical Service","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medical Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202201103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To present the clinical spectrum of the Emergency Department (ED) patients with presumed electrical shocks. Material and methods: The electronic recordings of the patients admitted to the ED of Unversity Hospital in Wroclaw between April 2020 and June 2021 were searched for the words: discharge, electrical storm, syncope, con¬vulsions. The received patients recordings were checked and all patients with electrical shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) both real and presumed were included into the study. Patients were divided into three groups: patients hospitalized due to adequate ICD discharges, patients hospitalized for other reason who had adequate interventions in the ICD memory and patients with incorrectly diagnosed ICD interventions. Results: The study group consisted of 26 patients. There was 18 men aged 65.9±10.9 and 8 women aged 68.1±12.4 (p=0.66). A total of 20 patients had electrical shocks confirmed by ICD memory checking and 6 patients had no ICD shocks. Conclusions: ED visits due to discharges of ICDs are rare. The medical history of ICD discharge could be misleading, because some patients interpret different symptoms or acoustic signals of the ICDs as a discharge. The ICD patients with syncope, unconsciousness, history of seizures should have their ICD checked for the possible discharges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因植入式心律转复除颤器休克而入院急诊科患者的临床特点
目的:介绍急诊科(ED)患者的临床谱推定电击。材料与方法:检索2020年4月至2021年6月在弗罗茨瓦夫大学医院急诊科收治的患者的电子记录,检索词为:放电、电暴、晕厥、抽搐。检查收到的患者记录,并将所有来自植入式心律转复除颤器(ICDs)的电击患者(包括真实的和假定的)纳入研究。患者被分为三组:因适当的ICD出院而住院的患者,因其他原因住院但在ICD记忆中有适当干预的患者和错误诊断的ICD干预的患者。结果:研究组共26例患者。男性18例(65.9±10.9),女性8例(68.1±12.4)(p=0.66)。共有20例患者经ICD记忆检查证实有电击,6例患者无ICD电击。结论:因icd出院而去ED就诊的病例很少。ICD放电的病史可能具有误导性,因为一些患者将不同的症状或ICD的声信号解释为放电。有晕厥、意识不清、癫痫发作史的ICD患者应检查ICD是否有可能出现出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELF-EVALUATION OF THE COMPLIANCE WITH HAND HYGIENE REGULATIONS BY PARAMEDICS IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS White Blood Cells Ratios in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Association with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus METHOD OF ERYTHROCYTE PROTECTION IN URGENT CARDIAC SURGERY POSSIBILITIES OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC BRAIN ISCHEMIA FULMINANT SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS CAUSED BY AEROBIC BACTERIA – A PARAMEDIC’S PERSPECTIVE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1