Sociologia econômica e competitividade em cooperativas agropecuárias centralizadas

Gustavo Leonardo Simão, Luiz Marcelo Antonialli, A. S. Macedo, A. C. Santos
{"title":"Sociologia econômica e competitividade em cooperativas agropecuárias centralizadas","authors":"Gustavo Leonardo Simão, Luiz Marcelo Antonialli, A. S. Macedo, A. C. Santos","doi":"10.21714/2238-68902018v20n2p088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of centralized cooperative enterprises in the agricultural sector has been marked by great complexity. This theoretical study aimed to discuss, in the light of the three epistemological currents of the Economic Sociology - Networks, Institutionalism in its economic aspect and Field Theory - the way to understand the search for competitiveness in agricultural centralized cooperatives. The analysis remained in the extrapolation of each one of the constituents of the epistemological foundations of Economic Sociology. While the Networks perspective ensure business economic viability by consolidation of the social capital, the Institutionalism focuses in contractual formalization to reduce transactional costs, and the Fields perspective look in the symbolic power, reached an maintained by the strategic skill of the agent on the structure. We conclude that the perspective by which economic results will be obtained as a result of social actions in centralized agricultural cooperatives context is likely to be analyzed under three theoretical approaches, in which each will have different factors involved, in relation to the understanding of the results.","PeriodicalId":214900,"journal":{"name":"Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais.","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21714/2238-68902018v20n2p088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The management of centralized cooperative enterprises in the agricultural sector has been marked by great complexity. This theoretical study aimed to discuss, in the light of the three epistemological currents of the Economic Sociology - Networks, Institutionalism in its economic aspect and Field Theory - the way to understand the search for competitiveness in agricultural centralized cooperatives. The analysis remained in the extrapolation of each one of the constituents of the epistemological foundations of Economic Sociology. While the Networks perspective ensure business economic viability by consolidation of the social capital, the Institutionalism focuses in contractual formalization to reduce transactional costs, and the Fields perspective look in the symbolic power, reached an maintained by the strategic skill of the agent on the structure. We conclude that the perspective by which economic results will be obtained as a result of social actions in centralized agricultural cooperatives context is likely to be analyzed under three theoretical approaches, in which each will have different factors involved, in relation to the understanding of the results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集中农业合作社的经济社会学与竞争力
农业部门集中合作企业的管理十分复杂。本理论研究旨在根据经济社会学的三种认识论潮流——网络、经济方面的制度主义和场理论——来讨论如何理解农业集中式合作社对竞争力的追求。分析仍然是对经济社会学的认识论基础的每一个组成部分的外推。网络视角通过巩固社会资本来确保企业的经济生存能力,制度主义视角关注契约正规化以降低交易成本,而菲尔兹视角关注的是符号权力,通过代理人在结构上的战略技能来实现和维持。我们的结论是,在集中式农业合作社背景下,社会行动将获得经济成果的视角可能会在三种理论方法下进行分析,其中每种方法都涉及不同的因素,与对结果的理解有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONSADS do Brasil: Um estudo a partir do índice de desenvolvimento rural e da análise fatorial múltipla Sociologia econômica e competitividade em cooperativas agropecuárias centralizadas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1