An Abstract Human-Centric Framework for Ethical Task-Automation Decisions

T. Smith
{"title":"An Abstract Human-Centric Framework for Ethical Task-Automation Decisions","authors":"T. Smith","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technology enabling previously unfeasible automation processes creates potential issues for those who once conducted said tasks. By reducing the resources taken to perform costly operations, businesses and organizations can potentially create substantial savings, increasing profitability by re-evaluating resources and their necessity. This shift towards automation exposes a vital issue; Where do displaced humans fit in the post-automation regime? This work proposes a new approach to this problem - an abstract framework for human-centric automation based on virtue ethics and system theory principles. Exploring the role of human agents within complex systems reveals an argument for the necessity of a human-centric approach to automation. By proposing a preliminary framework to enforce a set of mutually agreed-upon fundamental rights for workers and stakeholders, the resulting system can implement ethical treatment for all individuals within a system. The work concludes with a dialogue on the implications and applications of the proposed model with possible future extensions.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technology enabling previously unfeasible automation processes creates potential issues for those who once conducted said tasks. By reducing the resources taken to perform costly operations, businesses and organizations can potentially create substantial savings, increasing profitability by re-evaluating resources and their necessity. This shift towards automation exposes a vital issue; Where do displaced humans fit in the post-automation regime? This work proposes a new approach to this problem - an abstract framework for human-centric automation based on virtue ethics and system theory principles. Exploring the role of human agents within complex systems reveals an argument for the necessity of a human-centric approach to automation. By proposing a preliminary framework to enforce a set of mutually agreed-upon fundamental rights for workers and stakeholders, the resulting system can implement ethical treatment for all individuals within a system. The work concludes with a dialogue on the implications and applications of the proposed model with possible future extensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个抽象的以人为中心的伦理任务自动化决策框架
新技术实现了以前不可行的自动化流程,给那些曾经执行上述任务的人带来了潜在的问题。通过减少执行昂贵操作所需的资源,企业和组织可以潜在地创造大量的节省,通过重新评估资源及其必要性来提高盈利能力。这种向自动化的转变暴露了一个至关重要的问题;在后自动化时代,流离失所的人类该何去何从?本文提出了一种解决这一问题的新方法——基于美德伦理和系统理论原则的以人为中心的自动化抽象框架。探索复杂系统中人类代理的角色揭示了以人为中心的自动化方法的必要性。通过提出一个初步框架,为工人和利益相关者执行一套相互同意的基本权利,最终的系统可以对系统内的所有个人实施道德待遇。该工作以关于所提议模型的含义和应用以及可能的未来扩展的对话结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1