Short-circuit current calculation: a comparison between methods of IEC and ANSI standards using dynamic simulation as reference

Antonio Berizzi, A. Silvestri, Dario Zaninelli, S. Massucco
{"title":"Short-circuit current calculation: a comparison between methods of IEC and ANSI standards using dynamic simulation as reference","authors":"Antonio Berizzi, A. Silvestri, Dario Zaninelli, S. Massucco","doi":"10.1109/IAS.1993.299168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison is presented between two of the most significant international standards for short-circuit calculation: the IEC 909 Standard and the ANSI/IEEE C37.010-1979. The ANSI standard is more oriented toward breaker selection while the IEC standard gives general guidelines for short-circuit current computation. A set of short-circuit currents, directly extracted from the standards or obtainable after some elaborations, were determined as values useful for the comparison. A detailed dynamic analysis performed by using a well-known program for electromagnetic simulation was used as reference for the comparison between the two standards. The comparison shows that the IEC 909 is somewhat more ponderous than the ANSI standard. Hypothesis and assumptions are more numerous and more detailed in the IEC 909 than in the ANSI standard. In the former standard, more information and more formulas about the possibility of neglecting motor contributions are presented, as well as the basis for determining whether short-circuit is to be considered near or far from generators. The results of calculations confirm that both standards give satisfactory approximations of the short-circuit currents, which are mostly on the safety side.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":345027,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Twenty-Eighth IAS Annual Meeting","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Twenty-Eighth IAS Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1993.299168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

A comparison is presented between two of the most significant international standards for short-circuit calculation: the IEC 909 Standard and the ANSI/IEEE C37.010-1979. The ANSI standard is more oriented toward breaker selection while the IEC standard gives general guidelines for short-circuit current computation. A set of short-circuit currents, directly extracted from the standards or obtainable after some elaborations, were determined as values useful for the comparison. A detailed dynamic analysis performed by using a well-known program for electromagnetic simulation was used as reference for the comparison between the two standards. The comparison shows that the IEC 909 is somewhat more ponderous than the ANSI standard. Hypothesis and assumptions are more numerous and more detailed in the IEC 909 than in the ANSI standard. In the former standard, more information and more formulas about the possibility of neglecting motor contributions are presented, as well as the basis for determining whether short-circuit is to be considered near or far from generators. The results of calculations confirm that both standards give satisfactory approximations of the short-circuit currents, which are mostly on the safety side.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短路电流计算:以动态仿真为参考的IEC和ANSI标准方法的比较
比较了两个最重要的短路计算国际标准:IEC 909标准和ANSI/IEEE C37.010-1979。ANSI标准更侧重于断路器的选择,而IEC标准给出了短路电流计算的一般准则。一组短路电流,直接从标准中提取或经过一些详细说明,被确定为有用的比较值。利用一个著名的电磁仿真程序进行了详细的动态分析,作为对两个标准进行比较的参考。比较表明,IEC 909比ANSI标准要笨重一些。假设和假设在IEC 909中比在ANSI标准中更大量和更详细。在前一个标准中,提供了更多关于忽略电机贡献的可能性的信息和公式,以及确定是否在离发电机近或远的地方考虑短路的基础。计算结果证实,这两种标准都给出了令人满意的短路电流近似值,这些近似值大多在安全方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum torque control of an induction machine in the field weakening region Production of O/W type uniformly sized droplets using a convergent AC electric field The effect of temperature on starting and stabilization of compact fluorescent systems A low cost compact CCD grating spectrometer Surface handling effects of fabricating thin dielectric film HDPE on TSDC analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1