Seventeenth-Century Calvinism and Early Enlightenment Thought

A. Goudriaan
{"title":"Seventeenth-Century Calvinism and Early Enlightenment Thought","authors":"A. Goudriaan","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198728818.013.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysing a number of interactions between Calvinists and Early Enlightenment philosophers—and the receptions of John Calvin in these—this chapter shows a complex and persistent presence of Calvin and Calvinists in philosophical debates during the early Enlightenment period. Among Calvinists, Descartes found both opponents and followers. Reformed Cartesians have occasionally appealed to Calvin (e.g. on accommodation and the sensus divinitatis), praised the Reformer (Heidanus, Burman), or neglected him (van Til). The philosopher Arnold Geulincx has been protected (Heidanus.) and published (van Til) by Calvinists, before they began to associate him with Spinoza (Tuinman, Andala, Driessen). Thomas Hobbes quoted Calvin incidentally, but Calvinists usually opposed his philosophy. Thus, the jurist Ulrik Huber used Calvin’s teachings on the testimonium Spiritus sancti against Hobbes—an appeal to Calvin that Huber repeated against another philosopher’s claim that reason alone was able to demonstrate the divinity of scripture. In order to refute Spinozists, Reformed minister Carolus Tuinman translated Calvin’s treatise against the libertines (1545). Responding to Huguenot Pierre Bayle, the Lutheran philosopher G. W. Leibniz wrote favourably about Calvin’s teachings on predestination and providence, as he had done also about Calvin’s views on the Eucharist.","PeriodicalId":296358,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198728818.013.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysing a number of interactions between Calvinists and Early Enlightenment philosophers—and the receptions of John Calvin in these—this chapter shows a complex and persistent presence of Calvin and Calvinists in philosophical debates during the early Enlightenment period. Among Calvinists, Descartes found both opponents and followers. Reformed Cartesians have occasionally appealed to Calvin (e.g. on accommodation and the sensus divinitatis), praised the Reformer (Heidanus, Burman), or neglected him (van Til). The philosopher Arnold Geulincx has been protected (Heidanus.) and published (van Til) by Calvinists, before they began to associate him with Spinoza (Tuinman, Andala, Driessen). Thomas Hobbes quoted Calvin incidentally, but Calvinists usually opposed his philosophy. Thus, the jurist Ulrik Huber used Calvin’s teachings on the testimonium Spiritus sancti against Hobbes—an appeal to Calvin that Huber repeated against another philosopher’s claim that reason alone was able to demonstrate the divinity of scripture. In order to refute Spinozists, Reformed minister Carolus Tuinman translated Calvin’s treatise against the libertines (1545). Responding to Huguenot Pierre Bayle, the Lutheran philosopher G. W. Leibniz wrote favourably about Calvin’s teachings on predestination and providence, as he had done also about Calvin’s views on the Eucharist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
17世纪的加尔文主义和早期启蒙思想
本章分析了加尔文主义者和早期启蒙运动哲学家之间的一些互动,以及约翰·加尔文在这些互动中的接受情况,显示了加尔文和加尔文主义者在早期启蒙运动时期的哲学辩论中复杂而持久的存在。在加尔文主义者中,笛卡尔发现了反对者和追随者。改革后的笛卡儿派偶尔会求助于加尔文(例如,关于迁就和神感论),赞扬改革家(海达努斯,布尔曼),或忽视他(范蒂尔)。哲学家阿诺德·葛林克斯(Arnold Geulincx)在加尔文主义者开始将他与斯宾诺莎(Spinoza)联系在一起之前,一直受到保护(Heidanus)和出版(van Til)。托马斯·霍布斯顺便引用了加尔文的话,但加尔文主义者通常反对他的哲学。因此,法学家乌尔里克·休伯(Ulrik Huber)用加尔文的证词《神圣精神》(Spiritus sancti)来反对霍布斯——休伯反复向加尔文呼吁,反对另一位哲学家的主张,即只有理性才能证明圣经的神性。为了反驳斯宾诺莎主义者,改革宗牧师卡洛勒斯·图因曼翻译了加尔文反对自由主义者的论文(1545)。路德派哲学家莱布尼茨(G. W. Leibniz)在回应胡格诺派皮埃尔·贝利(Pierre Bayle)时,对加尔文关于宿命论和天意的教义表示赞赏,就像他对加尔文关于圣餐的观点所做的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Confessional Strife on Religious Authority in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century Calvin, Calvinism, and Medieval Thought Cultures of Calvinism in Early Modern Scotland Calvinist Debates on History Karl Barth’s Calvin: A Weimar Prophet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1