Authoritarianism and the Evolution of Voting Behaviour

Erik R. Tillman
{"title":"Authoritarianism and the Evolution of Voting Behaviour","authors":"Erik R. Tillman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896223.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the evolution of the relationship between authoritarianism and party support from 1990 to 2017. The chapter presents the analyses of eight different countries, and two conclusions emerge. First, high authoritarians have shifted towards radical right parties over the past three decades though there was no prior cross-national relationship between authoritarianism and party support in each country. As a result, different mainstream parties in each country have lost support as high authoritarians increasingly vote for PRR parties. This finding challenges the popular narrative that PRR parties have gained at the expense of social democratic parties, which only holds true in certain countries. The analysis also shows that low authoritarians have shifted towards left-liberal parties such as the greens, further contributing to the worldview evolution. As high authoritarians move towards radical right parties and low authoritarians towards left-liberal parties, traditional centre-left and centre-right parties that were based on twentieth-century class and religious conflicts struggle for support, particularly as generational replacement results in the depletion of their traditional voters.","PeriodicalId":246016,"journal":{"name":"Authoritarianism and the Evolution of West European Electoral Politics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authoritarianism and the Evolution of West European Electoral Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896223.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyses the evolution of the relationship between authoritarianism and party support from 1990 to 2017. The chapter presents the analyses of eight different countries, and two conclusions emerge. First, high authoritarians have shifted towards radical right parties over the past three decades though there was no prior cross-national relationship between authoritarianism and party support in each country. As a result, different mainstream parties in each country have lost support as high authoritarians increasingly vote for PRR parties. This finding challenges the popular narrative that PRR parties have gained at the expense of social democratic parties, which only holds true in certain countries. The analysis also shows that low authoritarians have shifted towards left-liberal parties such as the greens, further contributing to the worldview evolution. As high authoritarians move towards radical right parties and low authoritarians towards left-liberal parties, traditional centre-left and centre-right parties that were based on twentieth-century class and religious conflicts struggle for support, particularly as generational replacement results in the depletion of their traditional voters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威权主义与投票行为的演变
本章分析了1990年至2017年威权主义与政党支持关系的演变。本章对八个不同的国家进行了分析,得出了两个结论。首先,在过去的三十年里,虽然威权主义和政党支持之间没有跨国关系,但高级威权主义者已经转向激进的右翼政党。结果,随着高威权主义者越来越多地投票给PRR政党,每个国家的不同主流政党都失去了支持。这一发现挑战了一种流行的说法,即民主革命党以牺牲社会民主党为代价获得了胜利,这种说法只在某些国家成立。分析还显示,低威权主义者已转向左翼自由主义政党,如绿党,这进一步促进了世界观的演变。随着高权威主义者转向激进右翼政党,低权威主义者转向左翼自由主义政党,传统的中左翼和中右翼政党基于20世纪的阶级和宗教冲突而争取支持,特别是随着代际更替导致其传统选民的枯竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Authoritarianism and Support for Populist Radical Right Parties Authoritarianism and Potential Support for the Radical Right in Ireland Threat to National Community? West European Politics in Turmoil? Cultural Backlash or Worldview Evolution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1