The Blocking vs Depletion Model of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer

K. Tsung, Zhang Xu, Zhang Hui
{"title":"The Blocking vs Depletion Model of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer","authors":"K. Tsung, Zhang Xu, Zhang Hui","doi":"10.47363/jcrr/2022(4)163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) therapy is the most exciting development in cancer treatments in recent years. As of the end of 2021, more than a hundred of clinical trials have been carried out by several major drug makers and research hospitals all over the world just to explore the use of ICI antibodies in almost every type of cancer and under various clinical settings. These clinical trials have resulted waves of good news in every year’s major academic conferences and FDA approvals, and now ICI therapy is in the move to take over traditional therapy to become the major player in clinical management of cancer. On the other hand, most of these clinical trials have failed to show clear benefits in most cancer patients, and only few have been reported in public. In real-world clinical setting, ICI antibodies are being massively and sometimes abusively prescribed for almost every desperate situation with clear clinical benefit in only a few (<10%). Yet, the enthusiasm behind ICI therapy is not dampened by the massive clinical failure but has been growing. The reason for the consistent enthusiasm among clinicians and patients is the miracle-like clinical responses seen in some of the responders that even including late-stage hopeless cases. Every clinician wants to repeat this miracle in the next seemingly identical patient, and every patient and their family members want to believe that they are in line for that miracle. But the reality is disheartening in that clinicians do not see the predictable repeat of miracle-like responses in seemingly identical patients and most patients selecting ICI therapy as the last straw in life did not benefit from it, if not hurt by it. What then are the reasons that ICI therapy is so impressive when working and so unpredictable in responses? This review attempts to draw some mechanistic aspects based on our own experiences in ICI therapy and to come up with a different explanation for the unexplained clinical observations. The goal of this review is to alert the clinical field about the danger and irreversible damages that wrongly used ICI antibodies may cause, and at the same time to introduce some preliminary criteria to select proper patient for the benefits and to avoid the harms of ICI therapy.","PeriodicalId":372137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research Reviews &amp; Reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research Reviews &amp; Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcrr/2022(4)163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) therapy is the most exciting development in cancer treatments in recent years. As of the end of 2021, more than a hundred of clinical trials have been carried out by several major drug makers and research hospitals all over the world just to explore the use of ICI antibodies in almost every type of cancer and under various clinical settings. These clinical trials have resulted waves of good news in every year’s major academic conferences and FDA approvals, and now ICI therapy is in the move to take over traditional therapy to become the major player in clinical management of cancer. On the other hand, most of these clinical trials have failed to show clear benefits in most cancer patients, and only few have been reported in public. In real-world clinical setting, ICI antibodies are being massively and sometimes abusively prescribed for almost every desperate situation with clear clinical benefit in only a few (<10%). Yet, the enthusiasm behind ICI therapy is not dampened by the massive clinical failure but has been growing. The reason for the consistent enthusiasm among clinicians and patients is the miracle-like clinical responses seen in some of the responders that even including late-stage hopeless cases. Every clinician wants to repeat this miracle in the next seemingly identical patient, and every patient and their family members want to believe that they are in line for that miracle. But the reality is disheartening in that clinicians do not see the predictable repeat of miracle-like responses in seemingly identical patients and most patients selecting ICI therapy as the last straw in life did not benefit from it, if not hurt by it. What then are the reasons that ICI therapy is so impressive when working and so unpredictable in responses? This review attempts to draw some mechanistic aspects based on our own experiences in ICI therapy and to come up with a different explanation for the unexplained clinical observations. The goal of this review is to alert the clinical field about the danger and irreversible damages that wrongly used ICI antibodies may cause, and at the same time to introduce some preliminary criteria to select proper patient for the benefits and to avoid the harms of ICI therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症的阻断与耗竭模型
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗是近年来癌症治疗中最令人兴奋的发展。截至2021年底,全球几家主要制药商和研究型医院已经开展了一百多项临床试验,探索ICI抗体在几乎所有类型的癌症和各种临床环境中的应用。这些临床试验在每年的主要学术会议和FDA的批准上都带来了一波又一波的好消息,现在ICI疗法正在取代传统疗法,成为癌症临床治疗的主要参与者。另一方面,这些临床试验中的大多数都未能在大多数癌症患者身上显示出明显的益处,只有少数被公开报道过。在现实世界的临床环境中,ICI抗体被大量使用,有时被滥用于几乎所有绝望的情况,只有少数人(<10%)有明显的临床疗效。然而,ICI疗法背后的热情并没有因为大规模的临床失败而减弱,而是一直在增长。临床医生和患者之间持续热情的原因是在一些应答者身上看到了奇迹般的临床反应,甚至包括晚期无望的病例。每个临床医生都想在下一个看似相同的病人身上重复这个奇迹,每个病人和他们的家人都想相信他们正在等待这个奇迹。但现实是令人沮丧的,临床医生并没有在看似相同的患者身上看到可预测的奇迹般的重复反应,而且大多数选择ICI治疗作为生命中最后一根稻草的患者即使没有受到伤害,也没有从中受益。那么,ICI疗法在起作用时如此令人印象深刻,而反应如此不可预测的原因是什么呢?这篇综述试图根据我们自己在ICI治疗中的经验得出一些机制方面的结论,并对无法解释的临床观察结果提出不同的解释。本文的目的是提醒临床领域注意错误使用ICI抗体可能造成的危险和不可逆的损害,同时介绍一些初步的标准,以选择合适的患者,避免ICI治疗的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Future: Nanotechnological Strategies for Tackling Hepatocellular Carcinoma Efficacy of Individualized Cancer Management Metastatic Tumors of Unknown Primary (Muos) Definition, Frequency and General Considerations A Study to Assess the Effect of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia on Chemotherapy Schedule, Side Effects and its Management at a Tertiary Cancer Centre Unraveling the Cancer Metabolism: Fasting Reset, Ketogenic Diet? and Therapeutic Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1