Usability evaluation study of Metaverse as a contactless counseling platform

Jung Min Park, Chae Hwa Kim
{"title":"Usability evaluation study of Metaverse as a contactless counseling platform","authors":"Jung Min Park, Chae Hwa Kim","doi":"10.58990/galas.2023.1.2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the domestic Metaverse psychological counseling platform based on usability evaluation factors as a non-face-to-face counseling platform, and to suggest the possible development of the Metaverse platform in the future counseling scene. This study first examined the types of psychological counseling and metaverse, and analyzed two domestic metaverse psychological counseling platforms in terms of five usability evaluation factors: counselor support, interactivity, scalability, immersion, and ethical stability. Based on the analysis, we identified the benefits and limitations of the platforms and discussed the possibility of developing the Metaverse platform as a non-face-to-face counseling platform in the future. According to the analysis, the benefits of the Metaverse psychological counseling platform can be considered positive in terms of immersion and interaction, as privacy and anonymity are guaranteed. It also provides a safe environment for counseling participants, allowing them to experience healing by recreating traumatic scenes in the virtual world. In addition, in terms of scalability, we found that it can overcome geographical limitations by being independent of physical location. Limitations of the Metaverse psychological counseling platform include anonymity, which can lead to privacy issues, and the possibility that some clients may feel that counseling in the virtual world is an unrealistic experience. In addition, we found that accessibility gaps may occur due to the technical skills of platform users. Future research, regulations, and countermeasures should be fully considered to balance the benefits and limitations of these metaverse platforms and prepare appropriate countermeasures.","PeriodicalId":329444,"journal":{"name":"The Global Association of Applied Liberal Arts Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Association of Applied Liberal Arts Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58990/galas.2023.1.2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the domestic Metaverse psychological counseling platform based on usability evaluation factors as a non-face-to-face counseling platform, and to suggest the possible development of the Metaverse platform in the future counseling scene. This study first examined the types of psychological counseling and metaverse, and analyzed two domestic metaverse psychological counseling platforms in terms of five usability evaluation factors: counselor support, interactivity, scalability, immersion, and ethical stability. Based on the analysis, we identified the benefits and limitations of the platforms and discussed the possibility of developing the Metaverse platform as a non-face-to-face counseling platform in the future. According to the analysis, the benefits of the Metaverse psychological counseling platform can be considered positive in terms of immersion and interaction, as privacy and anonymity are guaranteed. It also provides a safe environment for counseling participants, allowing them to experience healing by recreating traumatic scenes in the virtual world. In addition, in terms of scalability, we found that it can overcome geographical limitations by being independent of physical location. Limitations of the Metaverse psychological counseling platform include anonymity, which can lead to privacy issues, and the possibility that some clients may feel that counseling in the virtual world is an unrealistic experience. In addition, we found that accessibility gaps may occur due to the technical skills of platform users. Future research, regulations, and countermeasures should be fully considered to balance the benefits and limitations of these metaverse platforms and prepare appropriate countermeasures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metaverse非接触式咨询平台可用性评价研究
本研究的目的是分析国内基于可用性评价因素的虚拟现实心理咨询平台作为非面对面咨询平台的现状,并提出虚拟现实平台在未来咨询场景中可能的发展方向。本研究首先考察了心理咨询和虚拟世界的类型,并从咨询师支持度、互动性、可扩展性、沉浸感和伦理稳定性五个可用性评价因素对国内两个虚拟世界心理咨询平台进行了分析。基于分析,我们确定了平台的优势和局限性,并讨论了未来将Metaverse平台发展为非面对面咨询平台的可能性。根据分析,Metaverse心理咨询平台在沉浸性和互动性方面的好处可以被认为是积极的,因为隐私和匿名性得到了保证。它还为咨询参与者提供了一个安全的环境,让他们通过在虚拟世界中重现创伤场景来体验治愈。此外,在可扩展性方面,我们发现它可以通过独立于物理位置来克服地理限制。Metaverse心理咨询平台的局限性包括匿名性,这可能会导致隐私问题,并且一些客户可能会觉得在虚拟世界中进行咨询是一种不现实的体验。此外,我们发现由于平台用户的技术水平不同,可能会出现可访问性差距。应充分考虑未来的研究、法规和对策,平衡这些元宇宙平台的优势和局限性,并制定相应的对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying Dyslexia Appearance of ChatGPT and English Study The Effects of Learner Autonomy on Writing in EFL Usability evaluation study of Metaverse as a contactless counseling platform A Narrative Study on Adult Learners' Class Experience Applying Blended Learning-Based Innovative Teaching Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1