Social and Entertainment Gratifications of Videogame Play Comparing Robot, AI, and Human Partners

N. Bowman, J. Banks
{"title":"Social and Entertainment Gratifications of Videogame Play Comparing Robot, AI, and Human Partners","authors":"N. Bowman, J. Banks","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As social robots’ and AI agents’ roles are becoming more diverse, those machines increasingly function as sociable partners. This trend raises questions about whether social gaming gratifications known to emerge in human-human co-play may (not) also manifest in human-machine co-play. In the present study, we examined social outcomes of playing a videogame with a human partner as compared to an ostensible social robot or A.I (i.e., computer-controlled player) partner. Participants (N = 103) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions in which they played a cooperative video game with either a human, embodied robot, or non-embodied AI. Results indicated that few statistically significant or meaningful differences existed between any of the partner types on perceived closeness with partner, relatedness need satisfaction, or entertainment outcomes. However, qualitative data suggested that human and robot partners were both seen as more sociable, while AI partners were seen as more functional.","PeriodicalId":286478,"journal":{"name":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

As social robots’ and AI agents’ roles are becoming more diverse, those machines increasingly function as sociable partners. This trend raises questions about whether social gaming gratifications known to emerge in human-human co-play may (not) also manifest in human-machine co-play. In the present study, we examined social outcomes of playing a videogame with a human partner as compared to an ostensible social robot or A.I (i.e., computer-controlled player) partner. Participants (N = 103) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions in which they played a cooperative video game with either a human, embodied robot, or non-embodied AI. Results indicated that few statistically significant or meaningful differences existed between any of the partner types on perceived closeness with partner, relatedness need satisfaction, or entertainment outcomes. However, qualitative data suggested that human and robot partners were both seen as more sociable, while AI partners were seen as more functional.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较机器人、人工智能和人类伙伴玩电子游戏的社交和娱乐满足感
随着社交机器人和人工智能代理的角色变得越来越多样化,这些机器越来越多地发挥社交伙伴的作用。这一趋势引发了一个问题,即社交游戏的满足感是否也会出现在人机合作中?在目前的研究中,我们研究了与人类伙伴一起玩电子游戏的社交结果,并将其与表面上的社交机器人或人工智能(即电脑控制的玩家)伙伴进行比较。参与者(N = 103)被随机分配到三种实验条件中,在这三种条件下,他们分别与人类、机器人或非人工智能一起玩合作视频游戏。结果表明,在任何一种伴侣类型之间,在感知与伴侣的亲密程度、相关性需求满意度或娱乐结果方面,几乎没有统计学上显著或有意义的差异。然而,定性数据表明,人类和机器人伴侣都被认为更善于社交,而人工智能伴侣则被认为更有功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Descriptive and Emotive Labels to Explain Human Perception of Gait Styles on a Compass Walker in Variable Contexts Communicating with SanTO – the first Catholic robot Transferring Dexterous Surgical Skill Knowledge between Robots for Semi-autonomous Teleoperation Improving Robot Transparency: An Investigation With Mobile Augmented Reality Development and Applicability of a Cable-driven Wearable Adaptive Rehabilitation Suit (WeARS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1