Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States (Dec. 4, 2012): Rejecting Bright-Line Rule, U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Temporary Government-Caused Flooding May Be a Compensable Taking, at Least in Some Circumstances

A. Varcoe
{"title":"Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States (Dec. 4, 2012): Rejecting Bright-Line Rule, U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Temporary Government-Caused Flooding May Be a Compensable Taking, at Least in Some Circumstances","authors":"A. Varcoe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2189590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thus far in the October 2012 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear two cases presenting takings law issues. This brief report focuses on the first of these two cases, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which was decided in December 2012. The question presented in Arkansas Game was whether government actions that temporarily result in flooding can amount to takings of private property that trigger the right to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2189590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Thus far in the October 2012 Term, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear two cases presenting takings law issues. This brief report focuses on the first of these two cases, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which was decided in December 2012. The question presented in Arkansas Game was whether government actions that temporarily result in flooding can amount to takings of private property that trigger the right to just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿肯色州狩猎和鱼类委员会诉美国(2012年12月4日):美国最高法院驳回了明线规则,认为至少在某些情况下,政府造成的临时洪水可能是可补偿的
到目前为止,美国大法院在2012年10月的任期内已经决定审理两起有关征收法的案件。这篇简短的报道主要关注这两个案件中的第一个,阿肯色州狩猎和鱼类委员会诉美国,这是在2012年12月决定的。《阿肯色游戏》案提出的问题是,政府暂时导致洪水泛滥的行为是否可以构成对私有财产的征用,从而触发第五修正案规定的公正赔偿权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tributação e o desenvolvimento sustentável (Taxation and Sustainable Development) U.S. Supreme Court Issues a Major Ruling on NPDES Permits Legal and Policy Issues in the Development of Nigeria’s Mining Sector: Charting the Way Forward A Cost Benefit Analysis of Shale Gas Well Bonding Systems in Pennsylvania Governance of Ecosystem Services Across Scales in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1