The Eyewitness War Museum in the Netherlands: Spectacle, Experience, and Usurping the Witness

Laura Morowitz
{"title":"The Eyewitness War Museum in the Netherlands: Spectacle, Experience, and Usurping the Witness","authors":"Laura Morowitz","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2111508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 2013, the Eyewitness War Museum (EWM) in Beek, the Netherlands, has been claiming to offer a ‘lifelike’ depiction of many of the central events of the years 1940 to 1945. While incorporating some video, soundtracks, and touchscreens, the heart of the museum is its thirteen largescale multifigure dioramas filled with war memorabilia, including uniforms, weapons, and everyday artifacts. Through the lifelike mannequins and the historical objects, the visitor is invited to ‘encounter’ and experience the events of the Second World War; so much so, that the visit promises to transform them into ‘eyewitnesses.’ In distinct contrast to numerous war and Holocaust museums that aim to involve the visitor as a ‘secondary witness’ through embodiment and self-reflection, the EWM visitor ‘experiences’ history as a captivating and consumable visual display, watching from a distanced position of spectatorship. Moreover, the ‘guide’ to the museum, an ‘ordinary’ German soldier, is fictional, while the items that surround him are authentic. After two decades of valorizing witnesses and the use of survivor testimony, museums like the EWM negate and downplay their value, labeling the commodified experience of the visitor equivalent to that of an historical ‘eyewitness.’ While exploring these issues, this article also provides a new tool in analyzing visitor responses by looking not at predetermined surveys—often designed by the very people who run the museums—but rather at more casual visitor responses in guidebooks and travel sites. Reviews on TripAdvisor and the travel platform izi.TRAVEL are explored to reveal the way that visitors perceive, remember, and interpret their experience in the museum.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2111508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 2013, the Eyewitness War Museum (EWM) in Beek, the Netherlands, has been claiming to offer a ‘lifelike’ depiction of many of the central events of the years 1940 to 1945. While incorporating some video, soundtracks, and touchscreens, the heart of the museum is its thirteen largescale multifigure dioramas filled with war memorabilia, including uniforms, weapons, and everyday artifacts. Through the lifelike mannequins and the historical objects, the visitor is invited to ‘encounter’ and experience the events of the Second World War; so much so, that the visit promises to transform them into ‘eyewitnesses.’ In distinct contrast to numerous war and Holocaust museums that aim to involve the visitor as a ‘secondary witness’ through embodiment and self-reflection, the EWM visitor ‘experiences’ history as a captivating and consumable visual display, watching from a distanced position of spectatorship. Moreover, the ‘guide’ to the museum, an ‘ordinary’ German soldier, is fictional, while the items that surround him are authentic. After two decades of valorizing witnesses and the use of survivor testimony, museums like the EWM negate and downplay their value, labeling the commodified experience of the visitor equivalent to that of an historical ‘eyewitness.’ While exploring these issues, this article also provides a new tool in analyzing visitor responses by looking not at predetermined surveys—often designed by the very people who run the museums—but rather at more casual visitor responses in guidebooks and travel sites. Reviews on TripAdvisor and the travel platform izi.TRAVEL are explored to reveal the way that visitors perceive, remember, and interpret their experience in the museum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰的目击者战争博物馆:奇观、体验和篡夺目击者
自2013年以来,荷兰比克的战争目击者博物馆(EWM)一直声称对1940年至1945年的许多核心事件进行了“栩栩如生”的描述。博物馆的核心是13个大型多人偶立体模型,里面摆满了战争纪念品,包括制服、武器和日常用品。通过栩栩如生的人体模型和历史物品,参观者被邀请“遭遇”和体验第二次世界大战的事件;如此之多,以至于这次访问有望使他们成为“目击者”。“与众多旨在通过体现和自我反思让游客成为‘次要见证者’的战争和大屠杀博物馆形成鲜明对比的是,EWM的游客‘体验’历史是一种迷人的、可消费的视觉展示,从远处观看。”此外,博物馆的“向导”是一个“普通”的德国士兵,这是虚构的,而他周围的物品是真实的。经过20年对目击者的评价和对幸存者证词的使用,像EWM这样的博物馆否定并淡化了他们的价值,将参观者的商品化体验等同于历史“目击者”的体验。在探讨这些问题的同时,本文还提供了一种分析游客反应的新工具,它不是通过预先确定的调查(通常是由博物馆的经营者设计的),而是通过旅游指南和旅游网站上更随意的游客反应。在TripAdvisor和旅游平台izi上的评论。旅游探索揭示游客感知,记忆和解释他们在博物馆的经历的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Art Met History: Holocaust Exhibitions in Early Postwar Hungary ‘Because They Were Jews!’ The Postwar Artworks of David Friedmann as Eyewitness Testimonies Whose Barbarianism? Exhibiting Antifascism, the Resistance, and the Holocaust in Postwar Italy and Now “Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals Artists Behind Barbed Wire: Art Exhibitions in the Detention Camps in Cyprus, 1947–1948
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1