Vendikennsla bætir árangur nemenda á lokaprófi í fyrsta árs verkfræðinámskeiði

Guðmundur V. Oddsson, Rúnar Unnþórsson
{"title":"Vendikennsla bætir árangur nemenda á lokaprófi í fyrsta árs verkfræðinámskeiði","authors":"Guðmundur V. Oddsson, Rúnar Unnþórsson","doi":"10.33112/ije.25.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate what is needed to improve students' understanding of the material taught in a first-year engineering course. Two flipped classroom methods were compared to traditional teaching method – based on lectures. The comparison was based on the students' achievements in the written final exam and student satisfaction with the course based on the annual teaching evaluation. The flipped classroom took place in 2015 and 2016, and the results were compared with a baseline for 10-year traditional teaching set in another study.","PeriodicalId":280722,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Journal of Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33112/ije.25.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate what is needed to improve students' understanding of the material taught in a first-year engineering course. Two flipped classroom methods were compared to traditional teaching method – based on lectures. The comparison was based on the students' achievements in the written final exam and student satisfaction with the course based on the annual teaching evaluation. The flipped classroom took place in 2015 and 2016, and the results were compared with a baseline for 10-year traditional teaching set in another study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是评估如何提高学生对一年级工程课程中所教材料的理解。将两种翻转课堂教学方法与传统课堂教学方法进行了比较。比较的依据是学生期末笔试成绩和学生对年度教学评价课程的满意度。翻转课堂于2015年和2016年进行,结果与另一项研究中10年传统教学的基线进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Starfsumhverfi og helstu aðferðir íslenskra verkefnastjóra Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic-Type Berm Breakwater Sjálfakandi ökutæki á Íslandi: Viðhorf almennings gagnvart nýjum ferðamáta Frammistöðumat á umfangsmiklum nemendateymum Ísland í dag - Nærri tveimur áratugum síðar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1