{"title":"Ekphrasis/exscription: Jean-Luc Nancy on thinking and touching art","authors":"","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526125798.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter explores the double quality of the image via the work of the contemporary French philosopher Jean-Luc Nancy, notably through his notions of ‘exscription’ and touch. In Nancy’s thought, signification and presence, the readable and the visible are articulated in a relation of mutual touching and withdrawal that is lateral, metonymic, and works in both directions. And if this is what W. J. T. Mitchell might term an ambivalent account of ekphrasis, it is not a relation of indifference. Rather, the signifying surface and its non-signifying other are turned towards one another in a non-appropriating embrace. If ekphrasis is a writing out, it is only in so far as all writing exscribes. And if the image is written out in ekphrasis, the image in its turn exscribes something within it – that which is not reducible to signification. Each mode is inaccessible from within the other, but, in Nancy’s thinking of ekphrasis, they press up against each other at the surface where they meet.","PeriodicalId":383663,"journal":{"name":"Ekphrastic encounters","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekphrastic encounters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526125798.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The chapter explores the double quality of the image via the work of the contemporary French philosopher Jean-Luc Nancy, notably through his notions of ‘exscription’ and touch. In Nancy’s thought, signification and presence, the readable and the visible are articulated in a relation of mutual touching and withdrawal that is lateral, metonymic, and works in both directions. And if this is what W. J. T. Mitchell might term an ambivalent account of ekphrasis, it is not a relation of indifference. Rather, the signifying surface and its non-signifying other are turned towards one another in a non-appropriating embrace. If ekphrasis is a writing out, it is only in so far as all writing exscribes. And if the image is written out in ekphrasis, the image in its turn exscribes something within it – that which is not reducible to signification. Each mode is inaccessible from within the other, but, in Nancy’s thinking of ekphrasis, they press up against each other at the surface where they meet.
这一章探讨了双图像的质量通过当代法国哲学家让•吕克•南希的工作,主要是通过他的“exscription”的概念和联系。在南希的思想中,意义和存在,可读和可见以一种相互接触和回避的关系表达出来,这是一种横向的,转喻的,双向的关系。如果这就是w·j·t·米切尔(W. J. T. Mitchell)所说的对习语的矛盾描述,那么这并不是一种冷漠的关系。相反,能指的表面和它的非能指的他者在一种非占有的拥抱中相互转向。如果短语是一种写作,它只是在所有写作的描述范围内。如果形象是用短语写出来的,那么形象又描述了其中的一些东西——那些不能简化为意义的东西。每一种模式都是无法从另一种模式内部进入的,但是,在南希对短语的思考中,它们在相遇的表面上相互挤压。