KA-Recsys: Knowledge Appropriate Patient Focused Recommendation Technologies

Khushboo Thaker
{"title":"KA-Recsys: Knowledge Appropriate Patient Focused Recommendation Technologies","authors":"Khushboo Thaker","doi":"10.1145/3523227.3547422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 MOTIVATION AND GOAL Diseases such as diabetes, cancer and heart disease demand that patients take an active role in disease management and seek health information for decision-making and self-management [1]. The most common methods of providing reliable information to patients include health literacy workshops and patient education materials [12, 15]. However, these materials are prepared for the general patient population and not always tailored to each patient’s specific needs [2, 12]. In addition, patients seek for their information needs through search engines. Previous studies have reported that search engines don’t always support information needs of patients [11]. Consequently, people seek information on disease specific online health communities (OHCs) [9]. But the risk of propagating misinformation still exists because existing OHCs do not provide an infrastructure to help patients find relevant and trustworthy information [8, 19].Existing patient focused health search engines and health recommender systems can accommodate better support of patients’ information needs by providing them trustworthy resources. However, current PHRS are personalized to patients’ interests and so information provided by these layperson-oriented systems is rather general [5, 6]. In fact, previous study has shown that a patient’s personal knowledge about their disease becomes more sophisticated over the course of disease [6, 7]. Therefore, our principal motivation is to fill this gap in current PHRS, by investigating ways to suggest individualized health information that not only adapts to patients’ current information needs but also patients’ knowledge-level across the disease trajectory. The health materials recommended at the level of patients’ knowledge will not only help them engage with materials but also help in informed decision making and self management [16].","PeriodicalId":443279,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523227.3547422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 MOTIVATION AND GOAL Diseases such as diabetes, cancer and heart disease demand that patients take an active role in disease management and seek health information for decision-making and self-management [1]. The most common methods of providing reliable information to patients include health literacy workshops and patient education materials [12, 15]. However, these materials are prepared for the general patient population and not always tailored to each patient’s specific needs [2, 12]. In addition, patients seek for their information needs through search engines. Previous studies have reported that search engines don’t always support information needs of patients [11]. Consequently, people seek information on disease specific online health communities (OHCs) [9]. But the risk of propagating misinformation still exists because existing OHCs do not provide an infrastructure to help patients find relevant and trustworthy information [8, 19].Existing patient focused health search engines and health recommender systems can accommodate better support of patients’ information needs by providing them trustworthy resources. However, current PHRS are personalized to patients’ interests and so information provided by these layperson-oriented systems is rather general [5, 6]. In fact, previous study has shown that a patient’s personal knowledge about their disease becomes more sophisticated over the course of disease [6, 7]. Therefore, our principal motivation is to fill this gap in current PHRS, by investigating ways to suggest individualized health information that not only adapts to patients’ current information needs but also patients’ knowledge-level across the disease trajectory. The health materials recommended at the level of patients’ knowledge will not only help them engage with materials but also help in informed decision making and self management [16].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KA-Recsys:以患者为中心的知识恰当推荐技术
糖尿病、癌症、心脏病等疾病要求患者积极参与疾病管理,寻求健康信息进行决策和自我管理[1]。向患者提供可靠信息的最常见方法包括健康素养讲习班和患者教育材料[12,15]。然而,这些材料是为一般患者群体准备的,并不总是针对每个患者的特定需求[2,12]。此外,患者通过搜索引擎寻找他们的信息需求。已有研究报道,搜索引擎并不总是支持患者的信息需求[11]。因此,人们寻求特定疾病的在线健康社区(ohc)信息[9]。但是传播错误信息的风险仍然存在,因为现有的OHCs没有提供基础设施来帮助患者找到相关和可信的信息[8,19]。现有的以患者为中心的健康搜索引擎和健康推荐系统可以通过向患者提供值得信赖的资源来更好地支持患者的信息需求。然而,目前的PHRS是根据患者的兴趣进行个性化的,因此这些面向外行人的系统提供的信息相当笼统[5,6]。事实上,先前的研究表明,患者对其疾病的个人知识随着病程的发展而变得更加复杂[6,7]。因此,我们的主要动机是通过研究建议个性化健康信息的方法来填补当前PHRS的这一空白,这些信息不仅适应患者当前的信息需求,而且适应患者在疾病轨迹中的知识水平。在患者知识层面推荐的健康材料不仅有助于患者参与材料,还有助于患者知情决策和自我管理[16]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for multi-target Cross-Domain Recommendation Imbalanced Data Sparsity as a Source of Unfair Bias in Collaborative Filtering Position Awareness Modeling with Knowledge Distillation for CTR Prediction Multi-Modal Dialog State Tracking for Interactive Fashion Recommendation Denoising Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1