Formal methods in computer human interaction: comparison, benefits, open questions

F. Paternò, G. Abowd, Philippe A. Palanque
{"title":"Formal methods in computer human interaction: comparison, benefits, open questions","authors":"F. Paternò, G. Abowd, Philippe A. Palanque","doi":"10.1145/257089.257417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to have a more focused discussion a specific case study has been selected and it will be used to compare the various approaches proposed. This case study is the specification of a subset of the functionality of a NetScapelike browser and a html page server. The proposals will have to answer a set of questions such as: can you verify usability properties on your specification? How difficult is it to translate your specification into an implementation? What kind of constructs do you use in order to structure your specification? Designers should consider issues such as: history of the performed interactions, browsability of the user interface (i.e. the use of links), non-preemptive behaviour, effective and continuous feedback about the current state of interactions.","PeriodicalId":281135,"journal":{"name":"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In order to have a more focused discussion a specific case study has been selected and it will be used to compare the various approaches proposed. This case study is the specification of a subset of the functionality of a NetScapelike browser and a html page server. The proposals will have to answer a set of questions such as: can you verify usability properties on your specification? How difficult is it to translate your specification into an implementation? What kind of constructs do you use in order to structure your specification? Designers should consider issues such as: history of the performed interactions, browsability of the user interface (i.e. the use of links), non-preemptive behaviour, effective and continuous feedback about the current state of interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人机交互的形式化方法:比较、利益、开放性问题
为了进行更集中的讨论,选择了一个具体的案例研究,并将使用它来比较所提出的各种方法。本案例研究是类netscape浏览器和html页面服务器功能子集的规范。提案必须回答一系列问题,例如:您能否验证规范中的可用性属性?将您的规范转换为实现有多难?您使用什么样的结构来构建您的规范?设计师应该考虑如下问题:执行交互的历史,用户界面的可浏览性(即链接的使用),非抢占性行为,关于交互当前状态的有效和持续的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CockpitView: a user interface framework for future network terminals The usability group at Reuters: virtually global Psychological issues of virtual environment interfaces Long-term interaction: learning the 4 Rs Browsing anatomical image databases: a case study of the visible human
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1