Identification of potential biomechanical risk factors for low back disorders during repetitive rebar lifting

M. F. Antwi-Afari, Heng Li, D. Edwards, Erika A. Parn, D. Owusu-Manu, Joonoh Seo, A. Wong
{"title":"Identification of potential biomechanical risk factors for low back disorders during repetitive rebar lifting","authors":"M. F. Antwi-Afari, Heng Li, D. Edwards, Erika A. Parn, D. Owusu-Manu, Joonoh Seo, A. Wong","doi":"10.1108/CI-05-2017-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nWork-related low back disorders (LBDs) are prevalent among rebar workers although their causes remain uncertain. The purpose of this study is to examine the self-reported discomfort and spinal biomechanics (muscle activity and spinal kinematics) experienced by rebar workers. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nIn all, 20 healthy male participants performed simulated repetitive rebar lifting tasks with three different lifting weights, using either a stoop (n = 10) or a squat (n = 10) lifting posture, until subjective fatigue was reached. During these tasks, trunk muscle activity and spinal kinematics were recorded using surface electromyography and motion sensors, respectively. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nA mixed-model, repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that an increase in lifting weight significantly increased lower back muscle activity at L3 level but decreased fatigue and time to fatigue (endurance time) (p < 0.05). Lifting postures had no significant effect on spinal biomechanics (p < 0.05). Test results revealed that lifting different weights causes disproportional loading upon muscles, which shortens the time to reach working endurance and increases the risk of developing LBDs among rebar workers. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nFuture research is required to: broaden the research scope to include other trades; investigate the effects of using assistive lifting devices to reduce manual handling risks posed; and develop automated human condition-based solutions to monitor trunk muscle activity and spinal kinematics. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis study fulfils an identified need to study laboratory-based simulated task conducted to investigate the risk of developing LBDs among rebar workers primarily caused by repetitive rebar lifting.","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2017-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Purpose Work-related low back disorders (LBDs) are prevalent among rebar workers although their causes remain uncertain. The purpose of this study is to examine the self-reported discomfort and spinal biomechanics (muscle activity and spinal kinematics) experienced by rebar workers. Design/methodology/approach In all, 20 healthy male participants performed simulated repetitive rebar lifting tasks with three different lifting weights, using either a stoop (n = 10) or a squat (n = 10) lifting posture, until subjective fatigue was reached. During these tasks, trunk muscle activity and spinal kinematics were recorded using surface electromyography and motion sensors, respectively. Findings A mixed-model, repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that an increase in lifting weight significantly increased lower back muscle activity at L3 level but decreased fatigue and time to fatigue (endurance time) (p < 0.05). Lifting postures had no significant effect on spinal biomechanics (p < 0.05). Test results revealed that lifting different weights causes disproportional loading upon muscles, which shortens the time to reach working endurance and increases the risk of developing LBDs among rebar workers. Research limitations/implications Future research is required to: broaden the research scope to include other trades; investigate the effects of using assistive lifting devices to reduce manual handling risks posed; and develop automated human condition-based solutions to monitor trunk muscle activity and spinal kinematics. Originality/value This study fulfils an identified need to study laboratory-based simulated task conducted to investigate the risk of developing LBDs among rebar workers primarily caused by repetitive rebar lifting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反复提钢筋时腰背部疾病的潜在生物力学危险因素的鉴定
目的与工作有关的腰背部疾病(lbd)在钢筋工人中普遍存在,但其原因尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检查钢筋工人自我报告的不适和脊柱生物力学(肌肉活动和脊柱运动学)。设计/方法/方法总共,20名健康男性参与者使用三种不同的举重,使用弯腰(n = 10)或蹲起(n = 10)的举重姿势进行模拟重复性钢筋举重任务,直到达到主观疲劳。在这些任务中,躯干肌肉活动和脊柱运动学分别用表面肌电图和运动传感器记录。混合模型、重复测量方差分析显示,举重的增加显著增加了L3水平的下背部肌肉活动,但减少了疲劳和疲劳时间(耐力时间)(p < 0.05)。举重姿势对脊柱生物力学无显著影响(p < 0.05)。试验结果表明,举重不同的重量会使肌肉承受不成比例的负荷,从而缩短了达到工作耐力的时间,增加了钢筋工人患lbd的风险。研究局限/启示未来的研究需要:扩大研究范围,纳入其他行业;调查使用辅助升降装置对减少人工搬运风险的影响;并开发基于人体状况的自动化解决方案,以监测躯干肌肉活动和脊柱运动学。原创性/价值本研究满足了一个确定的需求,即研究基于实验室的模拟任务,以调查螺纹钢工人中主要由重复的螺纹钢提升引起的lbd的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1