Word order effects in German sentences and German pseudo-word sentences

B. Röder, Tobias Schicke, Oliver Stock, G. Heberer, H. Neville, F. Rösler
{"title":"Word order effects in German sentences and German pseudo-word sentences","authors":"B. Röder, Tobias Schicke, Oliver Stock, G. Heberer, H. Neville, F. Rösler","doi":"10.1024//0253-4533.19.12.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: German belongs to those languages that allow a free permutation of subject, direct object and indirect object in verb final sentences. Five linear precedence (LP) principles have been postulated to describe preference patterns for the different word orders (Uszkoreit, 1986). The present study tested if these rules are valid for meaningful German sentences only or also hold for pseudo-word sentences, i.e., if they are independent of semantic language aspects. Twelve students saw sentences in six different but legal word orders and in one illegal word order, either with normal German words or pronounceable pseudo-words. They had to answer a question focussing on the thematic role of one or more complements. In addition, they rated the acceptability of a subset of sentences in all experimental conditions. The canonical word order was processed fastest and processing times increased the more LP-principles were violated, both for normal and pseudo-word sentences. Moreover, acceptability ratings decrea...","PeriodicalId":350712,"journal":{"name":"Sprache & Kognition","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprache & Kognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024//0253-4533.19.12.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Summary: German belongs to those languages that allow a free permutation of subject, direct object and indirect object in verb final sentences. Five linear precedence (LP) principles have been postulated to describe preference patterns for the different word orders (Uszkoreit, 1986). The present study tested if these rules are valid for meaningful German sentences only or also hold for pseudo-word sentences, i.e., if they are independent of semantic language aspects. Twelve students saw sentences in six different but legal word orders and in one illegal word order, either with normal German words or pronounceable pseudo-words. They had to answer a question focussing on the thematic role of one or more complements. In addition, they rated the acceptability of a subset of sentences in all experimental conditions. The canonical word order was processed fastest and processing times increased the more LP-principles were violated, both for normal and pseudo-word sentences. Moreover, acceptability ratings decrea...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语序对德语句子和德语假词句的影响
总结:德语属于允许主语、直接宾语和间接宾语在动词末句中自由排列的语言。五种线性优先(LP)原则被假设用来描述不同词序的偏好模式(Uszkoreit, 1986)。本研究测试了这些规则是否仅对有意义的德语句子有效,或者也适用于伪词句子,即,如果它们独立于语义语言方面。12名学生看到了六种不同但合法的词序和一种非法的词序,这些句子要么是正常的德语单词,要么是可发音的假词。他们必须回答一个问题,重点是一个或多个补语的主题作用。此外,他们还对所有实验条件下的句子子集的可接受性进行了评分。对于正常词句和伪词句,规范词序的处理速度最快,处理时间越长,违反的lp原则越多。此外,可接受性评级降低了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beeinflusst sprachlicher Input die Objektkategorisierung im Säuglingsalter Phonologisches Arbeitsgedächtnis, Wortschatz und morpho-syntaktische Sprachleistungen im Vorschulalter Umwege bei der Navigation im Labyrinth Affektmessung mit dem PC - Das Dresdner Angstwörterbuch Warum die Wahrnehmung von Kippfiguren bei jungen Kindern nicht kippt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1