Perceptions and Understandings of Low Literacy Among Developing Teacher Candidates

Johannah D Baugher, Eve V. Singleton
{"title":"Perceptions and Understandings of Low Literacy Among Developing Teacher Candidates","authors":"Johannah D Baugher, Eve V. Singleton","doi":"10.33499/EDREN.V10I1.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While little is known of the perceptions held by members of the general public toward persons of low literacy background, this research study worked to inform a subset of those perceptions as held by developing teacher candidates.  Additionally, this study sought to more concretely frame contributing and non-contributing factors which this same population believed influenced occurrences of low literacy.  Anchored in the concept of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989), this study collected and analyzed 56 survey responses which yielded informative themes that further defined low literacy as an obstacle, outcome, level of performance, or degree of achievement.  \nTeacher candidates further demonstrated an understanding that conditions of low literacy were often situationally-defined as those persons were commonly disadvantaged in some way.  Candidates’ responses further purported their action plan in confronting low literacy in their classroom was founded upon these verbs: act, invest, connect, and equalize.  Though this study alone is not comprehensive or absolute in its findings, it does help to inform a step of the journey that will lead to a more accurate understanding of the perceptions held of low literacy and its many, influential tentacles.","PeriodicalId":321193,"journal":{"name":"Educational Renaissance","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33499/EDREN.V10I1.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While little is known of the perceptions held by members of the general public toward persons of low literacy background, this research study worked to inform a subset of those perceptions as held by developing teacher candidates.  Additionally, this study sought to more concretely frame contributing and non-contributing factors which this same population believed influenced occurrences of low literacy.  Anchored in the concept of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989), this study collected and analyzed 56 survey responses which yielded informative themes that further defined low literacy as an obstacle, outcome, level of performance, or degree of achievement.  Teacher candidates further demonstrated an understanding that conditions of low literacy were often situationally-defined as those persons were commonly disadvantaged in some way.  Candidates’ responses further purported their action plan in confronting low literacy in their classroom was founded upon these verbs: act, invest, connect, and equalize.  Though this study alone is not comprehensive or absolute in its findings, it does help to inform a step of the journey that will lead to a more accurate understanding of the perceptions held of low literacy and its many, influential tentacles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展型教师候选人对低文化素养的认知与理解
虽然人们对普通公众对低文化背景的人的看法知之甚少,但本研究旨在了解发展中教师候选人所持有的这些看法的一部分。此外,本研究试图更具体地框架贡献和非贡献的因素,这同一人口认为影响低识字率的发生。本研究以交叉性概念为基础(Crenshaw, 1989),收集并分析了56项调查反馈,这些反馈产生了信息主题,进一步将低读写能力定义为障碍、结果、表现水平或成就程度。教师候选人进一步表现出一种理解,即识字率低的情况往往是根据情况定义的,即这些人通常在某些方面处于不利地位。候选人的回答进一步声称,他们在课堂上应对低识字率的行动计划是建立在这些动词之上的:行动、投资、联系和平等。虽然这项研究本身的发现并不全面或绝对,但它确实有助于为更准确地理解人们对低识字率及其许多有影响力的触角的看法提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Special Education Teachers in Residence Cradle-to-Prison Pipeline Perceptions and Understandings of Low Literacy Among Developing Teacher Candidates Special Educator Self-Efficacy Maintaining Fidelity in Teacher Education Programs During COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1