Determinants of research output submission in institutional repositories by faculty members in Nigerian universities

C. Onyebinama, C. Anunobi, Uzochukwu Anelechi Ubaferem Onyebinama
{"title":"Determinants of research output submission in institutional repositories by faculty members in Nigerian universities","authors":"C. Onyebinama, C. Anunobi, Uzochukwu Anelechi Ubaferem Onyebinama","doi":"10.1108/DLP-06-2020-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to determine and analyze the rate of content submission by lecturers in relation to type of university, discipline, academic qualification, rank and teaching experience and identified the determinants of research output submission by faculty members in Nigerian varsities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe survey was conducted in six universities with functional institutional repositories in Southern Nigeria. Data collated through questionnaire from the university lecturers were analyzed using frequency distribution, percentages and regression analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nResults showed that submission of research output was higher for lecturers in Social Sciences than for those in the Sciences; the highest among those with doctorate degree, senior lecturers and those with 6–10 years of teaching experience. The rank of faculty members and the type of university were significant determinants of research output submission.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe survey was limited to universities in Southern Nigeria with functional institutional repositories. There should be further investigations on same study in universities with functional institutional repositories in other regions in Nigeria.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIncreased submission rate by faculty members will sustain the institutional repositories.\n\n\nSocial implications\nFaculty members get in contact, make friends and engage in collaborative research.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis report contributes to the global knowledge and communication’s field through the provision of empirical evidence on the determinants of content submission in open access institutional repositories.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-06-2020-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to determine and analyze the rate of content submission by lecturers in relation to type of university, discipline, academic qualification, rank and teaching experience and identified the determinants of research output submission by faculty members in Nigerian varsities. Design/methodology/approach The survey was conducted in six universities with functional institutional repositories in Southern Nigeria. Data collated through questionnaire from the university lecturers were analyzed using frequency distribution, percentages and regression analysis. Findings Results showed that submission of research output was higher for lecturers in Social Sciences than for those in the Sciences; the highest among those with doctorate degree, senior lecturers and those with 6–10 years of teaching experience. The rank of faculty members and the type of university were significant determinants of research output submission. Research limitations/implications The survey was limited to universities in Southern Nigeria with functional institutional repositories. There should be further investigations on same study in universities with functional institutional repositories in other regions in Nigeria. Practical implications Increased submission rate by faculty members will sustain the institutional repositories. Social implications Faculty members get in contact, make friends and engage in collaborative research. Originality/value This report contributes to the global knowledge and communication’s field through the provision of empirical evidence on the determinants of content submission in open access institutional repositories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚大学教师在机构知识库中提交研究成果的决定因素
本文旨在确定和分析讲师提交的内容与大学类型、学科、学术资格、排名和教学经验有关的比率,并确定了尼日利亚各大学教师提交研究成果的决定因素。设计/方法/方法该调查在尼日利亚南部六所拥有功能性机构知识库的大学进行。通过对大学讲师的问卷调查整理数据,采用频率分布、百分比和回归分析进行分析。研究结果显示,社会科学讲师的研究成果提交量高于自然科学讲师;以博士学位、高级讲师和具有6-10年教学经验的教师最高。教师级别和大学类型是研究产出提交的重要决定因素。研究局限/启示:该调查仅限于尼日利亚南部具有功能性机构知识库的大学。应进一步调查尼日利亚其他地区具有功能性机构资料库的大学的同一研究。实际意义教员提交率的提高将维持机构知识库。社会意义教员们相互联系,结交朋友并参与合作研究。原创性/价值本报告通过提供开放获取机构知识库中内容提交决定因素的经验证据,为全球知识和传播领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1