Fundamental Rights in the EU’s External Trade Relations: From Promotion ‘Through’ Trade Agreements to Protection ‘In’ Trade Agreements

I. Mancini
{"title":"Fundamental Rights in the EU’s External Trade Relations: From Promotion ‘Through’ Trade Agreements to Protection ‘In’ Trade Agreements","authors":"I. Mancini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3628235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of trade, the EU emerges as a singular global actor from a fundamental rights perspective: unlike other international actors, the EU’s external action is to be guided by interests as much as values. The Treaty of Lisbon does not erase the tension between market goals and respect of fundamental rights, it opens up the possibility for the EU to pursue fundamental rights both in and through trade. Yet for a very long time, the EU has been a global actor through trade: it has taken for granted an understanding of human rights in trade that sees them as a development issue for third countries. No more sophisticated conceptualisations have been explored, making the EU’s current approach heavily reliant on this legacy. The way fundamental rights are provided protection in the Post-Lisbon new generation EU trade agreements emerges as outdated and not fit for purpose. The aim of this paper is to urge new conceptualisations of the relationship between trade agreements and fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"01 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3628235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of trade, the EU emerges as a singular global actor from a fundamental rights perspective: unlike other international actors, the EU’s external action is to be guided by interests as much as values. The Treaty of Lisbon does not erase the tension between market goals and respect of fundamental rights, it opens up the possibility for the EU to pursue fundamental rights both in and through trade. Yet for a very long time, the EU has been a global actor through trade: it has taken for granted an understanding of human rights in trade that sees them as a development issue for third countries. No more sophisticated conceptualisations have been explored, making the EU’s current approach heavily reliant on this legacy. The way fundamental rights are provided protection in the Post-Lisbon new generation EU trade agreements emerges as outdated and not fit for purpose. The aim of this paper is to urge new conceptualisations of the relationship between trade agreements and fundamental rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟对外贸易关系中的基本权利:从促进“通过”贸易协定到保护“在”贸易协定
在贸易背景下,从基本权利的角度来看,欧盟是一个独特的全球行动者:与其他国际行动者不同,欧盟的对外行动既要以价值观为导向,也要以利益为导向。《里斯本条约》并没有消除市场目标和尊重基本权利之间的紧张关系,它为欧盟在贸易和通过贸易追求基本权利提供了可能性。然而,在很长一段时间里,欧盟一直通过贸易扮演着全球角色:它理所当然地理解贸易中的人权,将其视为第三国的发展问题。没有更复杂的概念被探索,使欧盟目前的方法严重依赖于这一遗产。后里斯本时代的新一代欧盟贸易协定为基本权利提供保护的方式显得过时且不符合目的。本文的目的是推动对贸易协定和基本权利之间关系的新概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic Literary Theories and WTO Treaty Interpretation Clearing the fog: Forest Stewardship Council labelling and the World Trade Organization ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ ТОРГОВИХ ЗВИЧАЇВ У МІЖНАРОДНИХ КОМЕРЦІЙНИХ АРБІТРАЖНИХ СПОРАХ (Peculiarities of Trade Usages Application in International Commercial Arbitration Disputes) Is it Time for India to Adopt the Convention on the Sale of Goods? Impact of Financial Liberalization on Current Account with Complementary Effect of Institution: A Global Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1