Oсобенности правового регулирования медиации в Беларуси и Польше: сравнительно­‑правовой аспект

Наталья Бесецкая
{"title":"Oсобенности правового регулирования медиации в Беларуси и Польше: сравнительно­‑правовой аспект","authors":"Наталья Бесецкая","doi":"10.15290/sup.2019.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‣ Goal – this article’s main goal is to provide the differences in the legal regulation of mediation in the Belarusian and Polish legislation, taking into account the identification of comparable comparison criteria, and on their basis to determine the possibility of borrowing of certain rules. ‣ Research methodology – the author focuses on the application of comparative jurisprudence as a comparative method of cognition of mediation, in general, and its method of normative comparison by formal legal analysis, in particular. This allowed to identify the unique, typical, general and special in the legal regulation of mediation in the legislation of Belarus and Poland. ‣ Score/results – the article includes several sections where based on comparison of Belarusian and Polish legislation the most essential aspects of mediation institution are disclosed: sources of legal regulation; the field and grounds of mediation application; issues of conclusion and execution of mediation agreement. As a result, the trends of legal regulation of the institution of mediation in Belarus and Poland are revealed. ‣ Originality/value – the article is the first comparative legal study of the legislation of Belarus and Poland on mediation, has theoretical and practical significance, and contains author’s generalizations and conclusions. |","PeriodicalId":158947,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/sup.2019.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‣ Goal – this article’s main goal is to provide the differences in the legal regulation of mediation in the Belarusian and Polish legislation, taking into account the identification of comparable comparison criteria, and on their basis to determine the possibility of borrowing of certain rules. ‣ Research methodology – the author focuses on the application of comparative jurisprudence as a comparative method of cognition of mediation, in general, and its method of normative comparison by formal legal analysis, in particular. This allowed to identify the unique, typical, general and special in the legal regulation of mediation in the legislation of Belarus and Poland. ‣ Score/results – the article includes several sections where based on comparison of Belarusian and Polish legislation the most essential aspects of mediation institution are disclosed: sources of legal regulation; the field and grounds of mediation application; issues of conclusion and execution of mediation agreement. As a result, the trends of legal regulation of the institution of mediation in Belarus and Poland are revealed. ‣ Originality/value – the article is the first comparative legal study of the legislation of Belarus and Poland on mediation, has theoretical and practical significance, and contains author’s generalizations and conclusions. |
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白俄罗斯和波兰调解的法律监管:相对法律方面
目标-本文的主要目标是提供白俄罗斯和波兰立法中调解法律规定的差异,考虑到可比较比较标准的识别,并在其基础上确定借鉴某些规则的可能性。研究方法论——作者主要关注比较法学的应用,一般来说,比较法学是一种对调解的认知的比较方法,特别是通过正式的法律分析进行规范比较的方法。这使我们能够在白俄罗斯和波兰的立法中确定调解法律规定的独特、典型、一般和特殊之处。分数/结果-文章包括几个部分,其中基于白俄罗斯和波兰立法的比较,调解机构最重要的方面被披露:法律法规的来源;申请调解的范围和理由;调解协议的订立和执行问题。结果揭示了白俄罗斯和波兰调解制度的法律规制趋势。独创性/价值——本文是对白俄罗斯和波兰调解立法的首次比较法学研究,具有理论和实践意义,并包含作者的总结和结论。|
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Модели и правовое регулирование здравоохранения в Польше и Италии Проблемы правового регулирования административных услуг в Украине The Experience Economy: Perspectives for East European Borderlands Risk of Global Economic Crisis in 2022 and the Mechanism of Transmission of Economic Shocks between the Main Areas of the Global Economy The Models of Mandates of the Parliamentarians in Belarus and in the EU: Comparative Legal Aspect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1