A Study on the Review and Prospect of Honam Confucian Studies

Hak-rae Park
{"title":"A Study on the Review and Prospect of Honam Confucian Studies","authors":"Hak-rae Park","doi":"10.19065/japk.2022.7.57.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on Confucianism in Honam is in full swing in connection with raising interest in regional studies. However, the independent area of Honam Confucianism is still not very prominent in the overall study of Korean Confucianism. It can be said that the lack of specific research interest in the independent domain of Honam Confucianism is due to the existing arguments related to the setting of the category of Korean Confucian studies mediated by the region. \nThe regional categories related to the study of Korean Confucianism explicitly presented after the mid-1990s were generally structured as Kiho Confucianism and Yeongnam Confucianism, at which time \"Honam Confucianism\" was defined as a part of Kiho Confucianism. Honam Confucianism was specified as a part of Kiho Confucianism as the school structure related to regional categories, which had been understood by dividing into Kiho and Yeongnam schools until the previous period led to the establishment of a category combining local and Confucian studies in earnest. To some extent it can be said to be appropriate to divide the development of Confucianism in Joseon into the Toegye School and the Yulgok School by paying attention to the academic veins of the development of Confucianism in Joseon according to the scholastic unity that began in earnest from the 17th century. However, the division of the Toegye School and the Yulgok School into the Yeongnam School and the Kiho School in relation to the region has some problems, considering that there lacked a group of scholars with different academic backgrounds in the area. Moreover, organizing the topography of Joseon Confucianism by dividing it into Yeongnam Confucianism and Kiho Confucianism beyond the distinction between the Yeongnam School and the Kiho School is an over-simplification in that it not only overlooks the various academic flows within each region but also simplifies the flow of Joseon Confucianism. \nIn this study, I try to review the problems of the discussions on regional classification presented in the existing research on Confucianism in Korea, and to confirm that an independent area of Honam Confucian research is possible by paying close attention to this classification. In this process, I reveal that the understanding of the uniqueness of Honam Confucianism is not only consistently passed down by various Confucian scholars in the Joseon Dynasty, but also recognized by the Confucian scholars who were active in Honam as a regional background. Even now, the general direction of understanding is to understand and grasp the various Confucian trends and characteristics of Honam as Honam Confucianism, centering on the region called Honam. And based on this point, I review the general contents of the existing research results related to Honam Confucianism. Based on this, I have suggested a pilot plan to derive advanced results of future Honam Confucian research.","PeriodicalId":297075,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19065/japk.2022.7.57.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on Confucianism in Honam is in full swing in connection with raising interest in regional studies. However, the independent area of Honam Confucianism is still not very prominent in the overall study of Korean Confucianism. It can be said that the lack of specific research interest in the independent domain of Honam Confucianism is due to the existing arguments related to the setting of the category of Korean Confucian studies mediated by the region. The regional categories related to the study of Korean Confucianism explicitly presented after the mid-1990s were generally structured as Kiho Confucianism and Yeongnam Confucianism, at which time "Honam Confucianism" was defined as a part of Kiho Confucianism. Honam Confucianism was specified as a part of Kiho Confucianism as the school structure related to regional categories, which had been understood by dividing into Kiho and Yeongnam schools until the previous period led to the establishment of a category combining local and Confucian studies in earnest. To some extent it can be said to be appropriate to divide the development of Confucianism in Joseon into the Toegye School and the Yulgok School by paying attention to the academic veins of the development of Confucianism in Joseon according to the scholastic unity that began in earnest from the 17th century. However, the division of the Toegye School and the Yulgok School into the Yeongnam School and the Kiho School in relation to the region has some problems, considering that there lacked a group of scholars with different academic backgrounds in the area. Moreover, organizing the topography of Joseon Confucianism by dividing it into Yeongnam Confucianism and Kiho Confucianism beyond the distinction between the Yeongnam School and the Kiho School is an over-simplification in that it not only overlooks the various academic flows within each region but also simplifies the flow of Joseon Confucianism. In this study, I try to review the problems of the discussions on regional classification presented in the existing research on Confucianism in Korea, and to confirm that an independent area of Honam Confucian research is possible by paying close attention to this classification. In this process, I reveal that the understanding of the uniqueness of Honam Confucianism is not only consistently passed down by various Confucian scholars in the Joseon Dynasty, but also recognized by the Confucian scholars who were active in Honam as a regional background. Even now, the general direction of understanding is to understand and grasp the various Confucian trends and characteristics of Honam as Honam Confucianism, centering on the region called Honam. And based on this point, I review the general contents of the existing research results related to Honam Confucianism. Based on this, I have suggested a pilot plan to derive advanced results of future Honam Confucian research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湖南儒学研究的回顾与展望
湖南儒学研究随着地域研究的兴起而进入高潮。然而,湖南儒学的独立领域在韩国儒学的整体研究中仍然不是很突出。可以说,湖南儒学这一独立领域缺乏具体的研究兴趣,是由于以地域为中介的韩国儒学研究范畴设置存在相关争论。20世纪90年代中期以后明确提出的与韩国儒学研究相关的地域范畴,一般分为岐湖儒学和岭南儒学,当时将“湖南儒学”定义为岐湖儒学的一部分。湖南儒学被指定为岐湖儒学的一部分,因为在此之前,被划分为岐湖学派和岭南学派,并被理解为与地区范畴相关的学派结构,直到在此之前,真正建立了地方和儒学相结合的范畴。从17世纪开始的学术统一性来看朝鲜儒学发展的学术脉络,将朝鲜儒学发展分为退溪学派和栗谷学派,在一定程度上是合适的。但是,退溪派和栗谷派按照地区划分为岭南派和岐湖派的做法存在一些问题,因为该地区缺乏具有不同学术背景的学者群体。另外,如果把朝鲜儒学的地形图划分为岭南儒学和岐湖儒学,不仅忽略了各地区的各种学术流动,而且还简化了朝鲜儒学的流动,这是一种过于简单化的做法。在本研究中,我试图回顾现有韩国儒学研究中关于区域分类的讨论所存在的问题,并确认通过密切关注这一分类,湖南儒学研究有可能成为一个独立的领域。在这个过程中,我揭示了对湖南儒学独特性的认识,不仅是朝鲜时代的各种儒学家一直传承下来的,而且是作为地域背景活跃在湖南的儒学家们所认可的。即使是现在,理解的大方向也是以湖南地区为中心,把湖南的各种儒学动向和特点理解和把握为湖南儒学。并在此基础上,对现有湖南儒学研究成果的大致内容进行了综述。在此基础上,我提出了一个试点计划,以获得未来湖南儒家研究的先进成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concerning the Distinction between Xing and Ming in Mengzi 7B24 Focusing on Zhu Xi's Two Interpretations Disgust as seen through Lao-tzu’s Thought: Focusing on the Correlative Thinking of the Dao A Study on the Learning and Practice of Songdang Park Yeong and the Criticism of Junior Scholars Evaluations of Joseon Confucian Scholars on Shen Gui-bao’s Concept of Intelligence and Jeong Jae-gyu’s Understanding of it Hangang School’s Research Status, Achievements and Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1