Assessment of Postdural Puncture Headache in Women Under Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Trial Study

F. Jadidi, Farzaneh Jadidi, Saeed Khorramnia, Gholamreza Bazmandegan
{"title":"Assessment of Postdural Puncture Headache in Women Under Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Trial Study","authors":"F. Jadidi, Farzaneh Jadidi, Saeed Khorramnia, Gholamreza Bazmandegan","doi":"10.5812/tms.120876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common anesthesia technique used for cesarean section. Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the consequences following spinal anesthesia. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PDPH with 25-gauge Quincke and Whitacre’s spinal needles. Secondary outcomes were mean severity of PDPH, need for analgesic, movement limitation, and associated symptoms and signs followed up for 1 week after surgery. Methods: In this randomized trial study, 130 women were randomly divided into 2 equal groups based on the excel file and random between function. They received spinal anesthesia with either Quincke or Whitacre spinal needles. The incidence of PDPH was followed up 1 week later. Among PDPH women, secondary outcomes and symptoms/signs (such as nausea, vomiting, neck pain, and shoulder pain) were evaluated for 1 week after surgery. Results: All 130 women completed the study. PDPH was observed in 16 women (12.3%), including 6 (9.2%) in the Whitacre group and 10 (15.4%) in the Quincke group, which was not statically significant (P = 0.424). However, secondary outcomes and associated signs and symptoms were more common in the Whitacre group than in the Quincke group, followed up for 1 week in this trial. It can be related to more primary headache history in the Whitacre group than in the Quincke group. Conclusions: Overall, the Whitacre spinal needle is better than Quincke in reducing the incidence of PDPH, but primary headache history in young women causes higher mean severity of PDPH in them. Also, primary headache history causes more associated symptoms and signs in women with PDPH.","PeriodicalId":408913,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/tms.120876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common anesthesia technique used for cesarean section. Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the consequences following spinal anesthesia. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PDPH with 25-gauge Quincke and Whitacre’s spinal needles. Secondary outcomes were mean severity of PDPH, need for analgesic, movement limitation, and associated symptoms and signs followed up for 1 week after surgery. Methods: In this randomized trial study, 130 women were randomly divided into 2 equal groups based on the excel file and random between function. They received spinal anesthesia with either Quincke or Whitacre spinal needles. The incidence of PDPH was followed up 1 week later. Among PDPH women, secondary outcomes and symptoms/signs (such as nausea, vomiting, neck pain, and shoulder pain) were evaluated for 1 week after surgery. Results: All 130 women completed the study. PDPH was observed in 16 women (12.3%), including 6 (9.2%) in the Whitacre group and 10 (15.4%) in the Quincke group, which was not statically significant (P = 0.424). However, secondary outcomes and associated signs and symptoms were more common in the Whitacre group than in the Quincke group, followed up for 1 week in this trial. It can be related to more primary headache history in the Whitacre group than in the Quincke group. Conclusions: Overall, the Whitacre spinal needle is better than Quincke in reducing the incidence of PDPH, but primary headache history in young women causes higher mean severity of PDPH in them. Also, primary headache history causes more associated symptoms and signs in women with PDPH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性剖宫产术下女性硬膜后穿刺头痛的评估:一项随机试验研究
背景:脊髓麻醉是剖宫产术中最常用的麻醉技术。硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是脊髓麻醉后的后果之一。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较25号Quincke和Whitacre脊柱针的PDPH发生率。次要结局是PDPH的平均严重程度、是否需要镇痛药、运动受限以及术后随访1周的相关症状和体征。方法:采用随机试验方法,将130名女性随机分为2组,采用excel档案法和随机间函数法。他们接受了昆克(Quincke)或惠塔克(Whitacre)脊髓针的脊髓麻醉。1周后随访PDPH的发生情况。在PDPH女性中,次要结局和症状/体征(如恶心、呕吐、颈部疼痛和肩部疼痛)在手术后1周进行评估。结果:所有130名妇女完成了研究。PDPH 16例(12.3%),其中Whitacre组6例(9.2%),Quincke组10例(15.4%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.424)。然而,Whitacre组的次要结局和相关体征和症状比Quincke组更常见,在本试验中随访1周。Whitacre组比Quincke组有更多的原发性头痛病史。结论:总体而言,Whitacre脊髓针在降低PDPH发生率方面优于Quincke,但年轻女性的原发性头痛史导致其PDPH的平均严重程度更高。此外,原发性头痛史在患有PDPH的女性中引起更多相关症状和体征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Local Pressure on Needle Puncture Pain Severity During Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Elective Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial Results of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy by the Method of 12 Cores at Can Tho University Hospital The Effect of Milk Thistle, Green Tea, and Cinnamon Beverages on Liver Enzymes of Operating Room Anesthesia Personnel The Association between Kawasaki Disease and COVID-19: The Alarm for Pediatrics The First Case Series of Malaria Overlapped with COVID-19 in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1