Does the European Single Market Exist in the Era of a Coronavirus Pandemic? The Case of Intra and Extra-EU Trade in COVID-19-related Products

Adam A. Ambroziak
{"title":"Does the European Single Market Exist in the Era of a Coronavirus Pandemic? The Case of Intra and Extra-EU Trade in COVID-19-related Products","authors":"Adam A. Ambroziak","doi":"10.33067/SE.1.2021.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has been an extraordinary event for the EU Member States and a period wherein EU legislation and the efficiency of EU institutions have been put to the test. The crisis triggered by the decisions made by governments in Europe (which were motivated by their wishes to protect the health and lives of their peoples and to satisfy the rapid demand for drugs, personal protective equipment, and medical devices) disrupted market forces. Although most of these measures were based on both domestic and EU legislation, they seriously hindered the smooth functioning of the EU Single Market, including the free movement of goods. This paper aims to find out whether EU legislation succeeded in coping with the challenges triggered by COVID-19 in the field of international trade and whether measures taken by the European Commission with a view to complying with the rules of the EU Single Market adequately took care of the needs stemming from the COVID-19 outbreak and whether it properly tackled protectionist instruments adopted by the Member States. We have focused on international trade and the free movement of goods within the EU as they both constitute the cornerstone of EU economic integration. We found that although EU legislation was not tailored specifically for the times of a COVID-19 pandemic, in the area of international trade (including intra-EU trade), as well as in the field of placing goods on the market, it provided extraordinary solutions. Apparently, the explanations and guidelines provided by the Commission have limited the scope of individual protectionist and interventionist actions of the Member States.","PeriodicalId":365693,"journal":{"name":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","volume":"20 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.1.2021.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been an extraordinary event for the EU Member States and a period wherein EU legislation and the efficiency of EU institutions have been put to the test. The crisis triggered by the decisions made by governments in Europe (which were motivated by their wishes to protect the health and lives of their peoples and to satisfy the rapid demand for drugs, personal protective equipment, and medical devices) disrupted market forces. Although most of these measures were based on both domestic and EU legislation, they seriously hindered the smooth functioning of the EU Single Market, including the free movement of goods. This paper aims to find out whether EU legislation succeeded in coping with the challenges triggered by COVID-19 in the field of international trade and whether measures taken by the European Commission with a view to complying with the rules of the EU Single Market adequately took care of the needs stemming from the COVID-19 outbreak and whether it properly tackled protectionist instruments adopted by the Member States. We have focused on international trade and the free movement of goods within the EU as they both constitute the cornerstone of EU economic integration. We found that although EU legislation was not tailored specifically for the times of a COVID-19 pandemic, in the area of international trade (including intra-EU trade), as well as in the field of placing goods on the market, it provided extraordinary solutions. Apparently, the explanations and guidelines provided by the Commission have limited the scope of individual protectionist and interventionist actions of the Member States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在冠状病毒大流行时代,欧洲单一市场还存在吗?以欧盟内部和欧盟外与covid -19相关产品贸易为例
2019冠状病毒病大流行对欧盟成员国来说是一件非同寻常的事件,也是欧盟立法和欧盟机构效率受到考验的时期。欧洲各国政府的决定(其动机是希望保护本国人民的健康和生命,并满足对药品、个人防护装备和医疗器械的快速需求)引发的危机扰乱了市场力量。尽管这些措施大多是基于国内和欧盟立法,但它们严重阻碍了欧盟单一市场的顺利运作,包括货物的自由流动。本文旨在了解欧盟立法是否成功应对新冠肺炎在国际贸易领域引发的挑战,欧盟委员会为遵守欧盟单一市场规则而采取的措施是否充分照顾到新冠肺炎疫情带来的需求,以及欧盟委员会是否妥善处理成员国通过的保护主义文书。我们把重点放在国际贸易和欧盟内部货物的自由流动上,因为它们都是欧盟经济一体化的基石。我们发现,尽管欧盟的立法不是专门为COVID-19大流行时期量身定制的,但在国际贸易(包括欧盟内部贸易)领域,以及在商品投放市场领域,它提供了非凡的解决方案。显然,委员会提供的解释和准则限制了会员国个别保护主义和干预主义行动的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Rule of Law Crisis in Poland and “Normative Power EU” Thesis: Challenges and Implications Opposition Discourse About National Recovery and Resilience Plans. Poland and Hungary Compared Is the Spanish Army’s Experimental Brigade 2035 a Result of Civil-military Relations? A Historical Overview (1923–2021) In-betweenness and Migration Interdependence: Lessons from Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine War and Food (In)security – A Lesson from the Russian-Ukrainian Confl ict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1