Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) Strategies’: an Alternative to Empowering Undergraduate Student Thinking Abilities

H. Nasrudin, U. Azizah
{"title":"Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) Strategies’: an Alternative to Empowering Undergraduate Student Thinking Abilities","authors":"H. Nasrudin, U. Azizah","doi":"10.2991/snk-19.2019.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) is a constructivist based learning strategy. The implementation of RQA can motivate undergraduate students to read the assigned material and have an impact on improving the understanding of learning material. This study aims to describe undergraduate students' thinking abilities in the Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude material in the Process and Learning Outcomes Assessment of Chemistry (PLOAC) subject through the implementation of RQA-based textbooks. The design used is One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. This research was carried out in the chemistry department of Universitas Negeri Surabaya with the subjects of 25 undergraduate students. The results showed that: (1) Based on Bloom's taxonomy in Krathwohl's version, thinking ability obtain the percentage of undergraduate student achievement on each cognitive dimension include apply (C3) of 92.00, analyze (C4) of 68.00, and create (C6) of 86.67; and (2) N-gain scores for each cognitive dimension of thinking ability obtained have medium and high criteria. Based on the results of the study, the RQA strategy can be used as an alternative to empower undergraduate students' thinking ability.","PeriodicalId":256735,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

—Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) is a constructivist based learning strategy. The implementation of RQA can motivate undergraduate students to read the assigned material and have an impact on improving the understanding of learning material. This study aims to describe undergraduate students' thinking abilities in the Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude material in the Process and Learning Outcomes Assessment of Chemistry (PLOAC) subject through the implementation of RQA-based textbooks. The design used is One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. This research was carried out in the chemistry department of Universitas Negeri Surabaya with the subjects of 25 undergraduate students. The results showed that: (1) Based on Bloom's taxonomy in Krathwohl's version, thinking ability obtain the percentage of undergraduate student achievement on each cognitive dimension include apply (C3) of 92.00, analyze (C4) of 68.00, and create (C6) of 86.67; and (2) N-gain scores for each cognitive dimension of thinking ability obtained have medium and high criteria. Based on the results of the study, the RQA strategy can be used as an alternative to empower undergraduate students' thinking ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读、提问和回答(RQA)策略:增强大学生思维能力的另一种选择
阅读、提问和回答(RQA)是一种基于建构主义的学习策略。RQA的实施可以激励本科生阅读指定的材料,并对提高对学习材料的理解产生影响。本研究旨在通过实施基于rqa的教科书,描述本科学生在化学过程与学习成果评估(PLOAC)科目中对知识、技能和态度材料的真实评估中的思维能力。使用的设计是一组前测后测设计。这项研究是在泗水大学化学系进行的,对象是25名本科生。结果表明:(1)基于kkrathwohl版本中的Bloom分类法,思维能力在大学生各认知维度上的成绩占比为:应用(C3)为92.00,分析(C4)为68.00,创造(C6)为86.67;(2)获得的思维能力各认知维度的N-gain得分有中高两种标准。基于研究结果,RQA策略可以作为增强大学生思维能力的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Utilization of Protease Lactic Acid Bacteria as Meat Tenderizer The Development Of Anti Miskim Software To Reduce Misconception Of Students On Buffer Solution Matter Through Conceptual Change Text Strategy Chemical and Physical Process Combinations: Microwave in Lignin Degradation of Pecan Shells as Alternative Fuel Raw Materials The Validity of Teaching Materials Oriented to Argument-Driven-Inquiry Model to Train Students’ Science Literacy Chemmo Configuration Game As Learning Media On Periodic System Of Element Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1