#Activism: Identity, Affiliation, and Political Discourse-Making on Twitter

Alexah Konnelly
{"title":"#Activism: Identity, Affiliation, and Political Discourse-Making on Twitter","authors":"Alexah Konnelly","doi":"10.18357/AR.KONNELLYA.612015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twitter is increasingly recognized for having transformative potential for group advocacy. It also acts as a forum for spreading awareness and information on social justice (or activist) movements, as well as for dialogue between users on a given social justice subject. This study examines what motivates the use of hashtags in the activist context, and how this usage connects to broader discourses and ideologies. Drawing on a corpus of two prolific activist hashtags – #YesAllWomen and #HeForShe – I employ a range of methodologies and frameworks to tease apart issues of use, affiliation, and context. I operationalize Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), an analytical approach concerned with linguistic choices and how language is structured to achieve socio-cultural meanings, to analyze the engagement, meanings, and functions manifest in the dataset. The quantitative results are interpreted within the framework of Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. I argue that hashtags are both linguistic and social facilitative devices, employed by users to assert their collective identity and political affiliation.","PeriodicalId":143772,"journal":{"name":"The Arbutus Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arbutus Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/AR.KONNELLYA.612015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Twitter is increasingly recognized for having transformative potential for group advocacy. It also acts as a forum for spreading awareness and information on social justice (or activist) movements, as well as for dialogue between users on a given social justice subject. This study examines what motivates the use of hashtags in the activist context, and how this usage connects to broader discourses and ideologies. Drawing on a corpus of two prolific activist hashtags – #YesAllWomen and #HeForShe – I employ a range of methodologies and frameworks to tease apart issues of use, affiliation, and context. I operationalize Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), an analytical approach concerned with linguistic choices and how language is structured to achieve socio-cultural meanings, to analyze the engagement, meanings, and functions manifest in the dataset. The quantitative results are interpreted within the framework of Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. I argue that hashtags are both linguistic and social facilitative devices, employed by users to assert their collective identity and political affiliation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#行动主义:Twitter上的身份认同、隶属关系和政治话语制造
人们越来越认识到Twitter在群体倡导方面具有变革潜力。它还作为一个论坛,传播关于社会正义(或积极分子)运动的认识和信息,并供用户就某一社会正义主题进行对话。本研究探讨了在激进分子背景下使用标签的动机,以及这种使用如何与更广泛的话语和意识形态联系起来。利用两个多产的活动家标签——#YesAllWomen和#HeForShe——我采用了一系列的方法和框架来梳理使用、隶属关系和背景问题。我将系统功能语言学(SFL)付诸实践,这是一种关注语言选择以及语言如何构建以实现社会文化意义的分析方法,用于分析数据集中体现的参与、意义和功能。定量结果在女性主义批评话语分析的框架内进行解释。我认为,话题标签既是一种语言手段,也是一种社会促进手段,被用户用来维护他们的集体身份和政治立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy Neuroticism, Daily Physical Activity, and Daily Stress in Older Adults FM 3-24 and Religious Literacy in American Military Operations in the Middle East The Annexation of Crimea and EU Sanctions: An Ineffective Response The River’s Legal Personhood: A Branch Growing on Canada’s Multi-Juridical Living Tree Marrying Christ: Bernard of Clairvaux and the Song of Songs in Aemilia Lanyer’s "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1